2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2017.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising the complexity of tissue P systems with fission rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in [24] improve previously known upper bound PSPACE on the power of tissue P systems reported in [60,61]. The authors of [24] conjecture that the class PSPACE can still be reached when one assumes non-deterministic non-confluent tissue P systems, that is, allowing the same tissue P system to have both accepting and rejecting computations, with the final result determined by the existence of at least one accepting computation. A similar result has been already shown for the case of non-confluent active membrane systems of depth 1, see Sect.…”
Section: S E P a R A T I O N R U L E S : [A]supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results in [24] improve previously known upper bound PSPACE on the power of tissue P systems reported in [60,61]. The authors of [24] conjecture that the class PSPACE can still be reached when one assumes non-deterministic non-confluent tissue P systems, that is, allowing the same tissue P system to have both accepting and rejecting computations, with the final result determined by the existence of at least one accepting computation. A similar result has been already shown for the case of non-confluent active membrane systems of depth 1, see Sect.…”
Section: S E P a R A T I O N R U L E S : [A]supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Finally, the class PSPACE was shown to be the upper bound for several models of P systems [61,62,64], the question remaining open in the other cases. This upper bound was shown to be tight in some cases, while some other models have been recently reported to characterize the class # , defined by means of oracles for counting problems [22,24]. Note the use of oracles and complexity classes of the form , containing languages recognizable by polynomial-time Turing machines with oracles for languages in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The idea to attack computationally hard problems by means of P systems has been introduced quite early in the area of Membrane Computing, by considering the idea of active membranes [28]: new membranes are generated from existing ones through membrane division (mimicking the mitosis process), and then used in parallel to solve problems in or even in . Allowing or forbidding the use of some features, or considering different organizations of the membranes, results in systems of a different computational efficiency (see, e.g., [5,8,9,16,24,34,39,41,45,46]). Anyhow, this is not always the case: the use of some features can be considered (like, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, nesting of non-deterministic machines (where the non-determinism was simulated by membrane division) and a counting mechanism allows to characterize P #P , the class of all problems solvable by a deterministic TM with access to a #P oracle [1,3]. The same ideas can be applied to tissue P systems [4], where the different communication topology makes even more important to keep TM simulations compact [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%