2008
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising frailty in the clinical setting--a comparison of different approaches

Abstract: Hypophosphataemia in old patients is associated with the refeeding syndrome and reduced survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Desse modo, acrescentam os autores, devido à não homogeneidade dos parâme-tros disponíveis para mensurar o fenômeno, as taxas de prevalência existentes correm o risco de não expressarem adequadamente a realidade (6,14) . Quanto aos fatores envolvidos na determinação da fragilidade, a literatura pesquisada evidencia que indivíduos com idade avançada estão mais propensos à velhice fragilizada (4,6,9,13) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Desse modo, acrescentam os autores, devido à não homogeneidade dos parâme-tros disponíveis para mensurar o fenômeno, as taxas de prevalência existentes correm o risco de não expressarem adequadamente a realidade (6,14) . Quanto aos fatores envolvidos na determinação da fragilidade, a literatura pesquisada evidencia que indivíduos com idade avançada estão mais propensos à velhice fragilizada (4,6,9,13) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…For example, a person who reported poor self-rated health, arthritis and trouble climbing stairs would have three deficits and an index score of 3/42 or 0.07. Defining relative fitness and frailty in this way has been validated in several samples, 2,5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] including the National Population Health Survey. 9,20 The Frailty Index typically shows a consistent increase with age (about 3% per year on a log scale), a high cor relation with the risk of death (typically r 2 > 0.95 for the correlation between mortality and mean Frailty Index scores) and a submaximal limit (i.e., < 1% of people have a Frailty Index above 0.67).…”
Section: Frailty Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shorter measure is an advantage of the frailty phenotype; however, flexibility and generalizability may be reduced due to the highly specified items [28]. It may also be difficult to measure performance measures in patients with illness or severe physical limitations [29,30], without special equipment (i.e., dynamometers; [27]), and these items are often not be available in population-based databases. The Frailty Index is highly generalizable, being derivable in any clinical or population-based dataset with a critical mass of relevant variables.…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%