2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1574-0080(04)80018-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 61 Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
1,129
2
42

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,196 publications
(1,240 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
27
1,129
2
42
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, one expects the workplace or firm to be the primary container for interactions yielding spillovers. And yet, we can draw a line from Alfred Marshall through more recent work like Jaffe (1989), Audretsch and Feldman (2004) and Kerr and Kominers (2015), identifying important regional externalities in the production and dissemination of knowledge. The present article may be read as complementary to this tradition, suggesting that economically significant interactions among diverse problem solvers are not fully, or even mainly confined within individual workplaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, one expects the workplace or firm to be the primary container for interactions yielding spillovers. And yet, we can draw a line from Alfred Marshall through more recent work like Jaffe (1989), Audretsch and Feldman (2004) and Kerr and Kominers (2015), identifying important regional externalities in the production and dissemination of knowledge. The present article may be read as complementary to this tradition, suggesting that economically significant interactions among diverse problem solvers are not fully, or even mainly confined within individual workplaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 While the positive effects of local agglomeration on knowledge intensive industries might be clear from a theoretical point of view, it is not easy to identify empirically the causal effect of geographical proximity on R&D activity. Starting from the influential work of Acs et al (1993), Jaffe et al (1993), Audretsch and Feldman (1996) and Anselin et al (1997), there is a growing literature identifying the transmission channels from clustered firms to enhanced R&D, innovation activity and finally productivity growth. Acs et al (1993), for instance, estimate production functions for US data and find that, beside standard input factors, the geographical position in a cluster matters strongly.…”
Section: Rationalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscript i represents the unit of observation, such as regions, industries, or enterprises (Audretsch and Feldman 2004). To incorporate the spatial dimension, Jaffe (1989) modified the above traditional model and used: where IRD is private corporate expenditure on R&D, UR is the research expenditures occurred at universities, and GC measures the geographic coincidence of university and corporate research.…”
Section: Decomposing Innovation Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%