2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0072-9752(06)80017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 13 Descending inhibitory systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
4
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, this study showed activations in the ipsilateral DLPT during painful mechanical stimulation prior to sensitization. Moreover these activations correlated with activations in ipsilateral dGM, possibly reflecting either an augmented activation of endogenous inhibition by higher activation of projection neurons [7] or a noradrenergic activation of spinal ININs (indirect inhibition of projection neurons) as it has been shown in animal studies [35]. Similarly, previous fMRI studies also showed activations of the DLPT during painful stimuli in healthy humans [15], [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Accordingly, this study showed activations in the ipsilateral DLPT during painful mechanical stimulation prior to sensitization. Moreover these activations correlated with activations in ipsilateral dGM, possibly reflecting either an augmented activation of endogenous inhibition by higher activation of projection neurons [7] or a noradrenergic activation of spinal ININs (indirect inhibition of projection neurons) as it has been shown in animal studies [35]. Similarly, previous fMRI studies also showed activations of the DLPT during painful stimuli in healthy humans [15], [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the finding that the TRPC4/C5 antagonist failed to influence pain behavior of neuropathic animals when microinjected into a control site, the internal capsule, supports the interpretation that the TRPC4/C5 antagonist-induced suppression of neuropathic pain behavior in the present study was due to action on the amygdala rather than elsewhere in the brain. In line with this, it has been shown that TRPC4/C5 in the amygdala are expressed particularly in the lateral nucleus [17,18], which has direct and indirect intra-amygdaloid projections to the CeA [10], the main sensory output nucleus that is involved in processing of pain-related signals and that through its connections to the brainstem can contribute to the descending control of pain [14,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Amygdala, particularly its lateral capsular subdivision within the central nucleus (CeA), the main output pathway to the brainstem, is also involved in processing and regulation of emotional aspects of pain and, through its efferent brainstem projections, in descending control of spinal pain-relay neurons [14,16]. Recently, it was demonstrated that among multiple amygdaloid mechanisms involved in the control of anxiety-driven behaviors are transient potential channels 4 and 5 (TRPC4/C5) that are members of the TRPC1/4/5 subfamily and that gate afferent amygdaloid inputs in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although most of these mechanisms exert broad bilateral pain-inhibitory effects (Pertovaara and Almeida 2006), noradrenergic pathways inhibit nociceptive activity hemilaterally (Tsuruoka and Willis 1996a, b;Tsuruoka et al 1999;Tsuruoka et al 2003) via projections from the locus coeruleus that act on spinal α 2 -adrenoreceptors (Clark and Proudfit 1992;Jones and Gebhart 1986b, a). Interestingly, in rats with bilateral lesions of the locus coeruleus, paw withdrawal latencies were found to be shorter not only in the carrageenan-inflamed hindpaw but also in the ipsilateral non-inflamed forepaw (Tsuruoka et al 2004).…”
Section: Analgesia To Blunt Pressure In the Foreheadmentioning
confidence: 99%