Changing dynamics of the nuclear energy policy‐making process in Japan

Abstract

To improve the effectiveness of environmental policy and governance, recent theoretical and empirical research increasingly suggests the adoption of multi‐level and more participatory policy‐making processes over traditionally centralized policy‐making processes. This article takes the Fukushima nuclear crisis of 2011 as a prime example in an attempt to assess the changing dynamics of the nuclear energy policy‐making process in Japan. To explore the changing dynamics, the paper focuses on the roles of the judicial branch and local governments in the nuclear energy policy‐making process. Nuclear energy policy in Japan has evolved along with industrial policies for economic growth. Before the Fukushima crisis, neither the judicial branch nor local governments were regarded as influential actors in nuclear energy policy‐making. The judicial branch basically supported government policy in litigation brought by civic groups. Local governments in rural areas tried to attract nuclear power plant construction because of promised subsidies from the national government and a solid tax base from construction and jobs. However, after the Fukushima crisis, both judicial branches and local governments became more influential in the nuclear energy policy‐making process. Local and high courts now actively issue injunctions against the reoperation of nuclear power plants. In gubernatorial or mayoral elections of local governments where nuclear power plants are located, candidates are politically pressured to express their stance on nuclear power plants more explicitly than in the past. Anti‐nuclear civic groups are also gradually changing the focus of their lobbying efforts to local elections.

Evaluating deliberative participation from a social learning perspective: A case study of the 2012 National Energy Deliberative Polling in post‐Fukushima Japan

“…It is in this context of transition that this finding makes a particularly useful contribution by offering a better understanding of the roles played by citizens and changes in public values and beliefs regarding energy system transitions (Butler & Demski, 2013; Fast, 2013). Our findings can complement the literature on the roles of other actors at local levels, most notably local governments and local communities, in the context of Japanese nuclear governance (Kikuchi, 2020).…”

The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) ‐based strategic mapping of green nuclear energy investments with spherical fuzzy group decision‐making approach

“…In the use of nuclear energy, the country can produce its own energy. In this way, it is not necessary to import energy from abroad 6 . This situation ensures the energy supply security of the country and prevents its economic and political dependence on another country.…”

Development of Flotation Device for Removing Unburnt Carbon in Fly Ash for Use in Hardened Cementitious Materials

“…In Japan, the power supply includes renewable [ 1 ], thermal [ 2 ], and nuclear energy [ 3 ]; however, global environmental issues and the recent power supply situation mean that renewable energy is expected to expand substantially. Nevertheless, increasing the proportion of renewable energy in the energy mix will take time, and thermal power generation will still be required.…”