1978
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(78)90060-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the particle size and the concentration of cigarette smoke through the column of a cigarette

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Substituting CMD, a,, p, M, and U into the equations, the average number concentration was calculated to be 7.2 X l o 9 particles/cm3, a value of the same magnitude as those reported by others [Tables 3(a) and 3(b)]. Depending on the mass and volume at each puff (Figure 4), the number concentration could vary with the puff number (Ishizu et al, 1978).…”
Section: Estimate Of Number Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Substituting CMD, a,, p, M, and U into the equations, the average number concentration was calculated to be 7.2 X l o 9 particles/cm3, a value of the same magnitude as those reported by others [Tables 3(a) and 3(b)]. Depending on the mass and volume at each puff (Figure 4), the number concentration could vary with the puff number (Ishizu et al, 1978).…”
Section: Estimate Of Number Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Different sizing methods measure different size-related properties of the particles. For example, Sano et al (1953) and Holmes et al (1959) reported aerodynamic equivalent diameters ranging from 0.6 to 1.3 pm in Millikan cells; while diameters ranging from 0.15 to 0.35 pm were reported by Ishizu et al (1978) and Ingebrethsen (1986) using light-scattering devices. Researchers have tried to compare various reported diameters by assuming values for certain physical properties such as refractive index, and particle density, and by assuming different types of size distribution (lognormal, logarithmic gamma [Moriguchi, 19591).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typical cigarette smoke particle has diameter d,, = 0.1 pm and d, = 0.3 p n for sidestream and mainstream CSP, respectively. Although sizes as small as d,, = 0.17 pm were reported for mainstream CSP and as small as d, = 0.065 pm for sidestream CSP (Ishizu et al, 1978;Li, 1993). Therefore, the Kelvin and Fuchs effects are significant only for a small population of the particles.…”
Section: Kelvin Eflect Und Fuchs Effectmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have revealed that variations in manufacturing methodology for combustible cigarettes led to droplet size distributions ranging from 0.2 to 0.9 mm (Geiss et al, 2015;Ishizu et al, 1977), which likely reflects the particular sampling and dilution methodology used. Consequently, the way in which an aerosol is conditioned, sampled and diluted may affect droplet sizes prior to measurement, leading to erroneous size distribution determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%