1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6223(96)00067-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in PSD of progressively activated carbons obtained from their supercritical methane isotherms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that it is capable of identifying pore sizes and determining their pore volume for pores not detected by 77 K nitrogen. 27 In addition to the use of supercritical methane adsorption, the adsorption of CO 2 up to pressures of 3 MPa has also been studied previously. [23][24][25] It was shown that high-pressure CO 2 adsorption at 273 K can be used to characterize the whole range of porosity (down to a pore size close to 0.4 nm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that it is capable of identifying pore sizes and determining their pore volume for pores not detected by 77 K nitrogen. 27 In addition to the use of supercritical methane adsorption, the adsorption of CO 2 up to pressures of 3 MPa has also been studied previously. [23][24][25] It was shown that high-pressure CO 2 adsorption at 273 K can be used to characterize the whole range of porosity (down to a pore size close to 0.4 nm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the only enforced equivalence between the pore network model and the real structure is that they both yield the same adsorption isotherm for a single pure adsorbate. The simplest pore network model is the “bundle of straight pores” (or “BSP”) model. In this model, each pore is considered to be accessible to all the adsorptive species in the bulk gas phase. One can imagine (conceptually) a bundle of pores each of which connects to the surface of the adsorbent or (more physically) a connected network of pores in which the connectivity of the network is sufficiently good that the adsorptive species can pass throughout the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most appropriate molecular simulation technique applied to adsorption in microporous solids is the grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation method . Originally applied only to the adsorption of pure components, it has more recently been extended to calculate the adsorption of several species adsorbing simultaneously. McEnaney et al, Davies and Seaton, Davies et al, López-Ramón et al, Gusev et al, Gusev and O'Brien, Saimos et al, and Sosin et al have in turn applied GCMC simulations to the characterization of activated carbons. (Sosin et al used the simulated results of Cracknell et al in their calculations.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the representation of a PSD as an analytical function, a discrete representation is more flexible and does not attempt to quantify the PSD away from the quadrature points. Recent PSD analyses that have been based on discrete distributions include those of McEnaney et al, Gusev et al, Gusev and O'Brien, Samios et al, Sosin et al, and Sosin and Quinn . In this paper we extend the development of such an approach and show how it can be used to establish whether any PSD exists that can be fitted to the data and how it can be used to calculate a PSD representative of the real solid.…”
Section: Determining Whether a Psd Can Be Fitted To Experimental Adso...mentioning
confidence: 93%