1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81868-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in protamine 1 distribution in human sperm nucleus during in vitro sperm-oocyte interaction: An immunoelectron microscopic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the selection procedure of the sperm during in vitro fertilization by swim-up or by Percoll, which may affect the chromatin of the spermatozoa and consequently the DNA binding to CA3. These spermatozoa show a significantly lower nuclear labeling with anti-protamine-1 antibody than the ejaculated ones (Colleu et al, 1997). Another factor also influencing CA3 staining of spermatozoa is sperm quality itself.…”
Section: Figsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This may be due to the selection procedure of the sperm during in vitro fertilization by swim-up or by Percoll, which may affect the chromatin of the spermatozoa and consequently the DNA binding to CA3. These spermatozoa show a significantly lower nuclear labeling with anti-protamine-1 antibody than the ejaculated ones (Colleu et al, 1997). Another factor also influencing CA3 staining of spermatozoa is sperm quality itself.…”
Section: Figsmentioning
confidence: 92%