2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in pore size distribution and hydraulic properties of forest soil resulting from structural development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models are developed based on the close similarity between the shapes of PSD and pore size distribution (Arya and Paris, 1981;Arya et al, 1999;Hayashi et al, 2006;Hwang and Choi, 2006). A significant contribution, the AP model, was made by Arya and Paris (1981).…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models are developed based on the close similarity between the shapes of PSD and pore size distribution (Arya and Paris, 1981;Arya et al, 1999;Hayashi et al, 2006;Hwang and Choi, 2006). A significant contribution, the AP model, was made by Arya and Paris (1981).…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soils have a layered structure with obvious heterogeneity in both the horizontal and vertical directions (Li and Shao, 2013). It has been reported that land use, soil texture and structure have substantial effects on water retention (Hayashi et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2011;Haghverdi et al, 2015). Accurate prediction of soil water retention is essential for optimizing irrigation schedules, draining to alleviate salinization, and calculating ecological water requirement in this region.…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous criteria had been used to define pore size classes, pores > 100 µm are often classified as large macropores, and 30 µm is often taken as the boundary between small macropores and mesopores, and pores of <0.2 µm are generally referred to as micropores [18]. Hence, pore size distribution in the current study was categorized into four classes: large and small macropores (>100 µm and 30-100 µm, respectively), and meso-(0.2-30 µm) and micropores (<0.2 µm).…”
Section: Relationship Between Soil Co 2 Efflux and Pore Size Distribumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be owing to the different soil functions in different soil pores. Small macropores are responsible for optimizing both gas and water fluxes simultaneously in soil [18]. However, large macropores constitute free spaces where plant roots can grow or earthworm activity prevails [19].…”
Section: Relationship Between Soil Co 2 Efflux and Pore Size Distribumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considerable increase in soil N was mainly due to the soil reclamation and fertilizer application. During reclamation, both the aboveground and underground parts of the crop can flourish yearly, and large amounts of tiny holes and channels observable in the soil with growing crops indicate a fibrous root system, creating micropores in the soil (Hayashi et al, 2006;Tejada et al, 2006). This can improve hydraulic conductivity in the soil structure and provide available water and nutrients for crops to grow.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Changes In Soil Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%