1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02388334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps

Abstract: Four male subjects aged 23-34 years were studied during 60 days of unilateral strength training and 40 days of detraining. Training was carried out four times a week and consisted of six series of ten maximal isokinetic knee extensions at an angular velocity of 2.09 rad.s-1. At the start and at every 20th day of training and detraining, isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), integrated electromyographic activity (iEMG) and quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) assessed at seven fractions of femu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

63
429
4
16

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 617 publications
(522 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
63
429
4
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The most reasonable explanation for the changes in the kinematic and force production characteristics, after 8 weeks of U+D training, was the occurrence of neural adaptations. Similar adaptations have been demonstrated in strength training [9,17,18] and explosive training studies [19][20][21] which include powerful anisometric single or multi joint contractions, as in the current study. These neural adaptations could be either improvement in neural drive to the muscle, by increasing the recruited number of motor units during contractions and/or by increasing the "firing" (excitation) rate of the motor units of the trained muscles, or/and changes in the muscular coordination, by redefying the recruiting strategy between motor units of the same muscle, or a group of synergist muscles [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The most reasonable explanation for the changes in the kinematic and force production characteristics, after 8 weeks of U+D training, was the occurrence of neural adaptations. Similar adaptations have been demonstrated in strength training [9,17,18] and explosive training studies [19][20][21] which include powerful anisometric single or multi joint contractions, as in the current study. These neural adaptations could be either improvement in neural drive to the muscle, by increasing the recruited number of motor units during contractions and/or by increasing the "firing" (excitation) rate of the motor units of the trained muscles, or/and changes in the muscular coordination, by redefying the recruiting strategy between motor units of the same muscle, or a group of synergist muscles [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is true that saphenous blood flow is relatively low, but some blood must be drained from the proximal thigh muscle, which has a slightly higher lactate concentration than blood from the more distal part to compensate for the low lactate level in the saphenous vein. This point of view is in accordance with the explanation given earlier for O 2 saturation, and agrees with the observation that after training the proximal part of the kneeextensor muscle enlarges more than the more distal portions both in young (Narici et al 1989(Narici et al , 1996 and older individuals (Kryger, 1998). Available data on glucose reveal similar concentrations when sampling in the proximal and distal direction of the femoral artery, with a tendency for glucose concentration to be slightly higher in the proximal direction ( Fig.…”
Section: Arterial-femoral Venous Difference For Substrates and Metabosupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Observations of increased surface EMG [79,80,81,82,83,84] , increased motor unit firing rates [85,86] , cross education [82,87,88,89,90,91] and enhanced reflex potentiation [92,93,94] are consistent with the possibility but none provides conclusive evidence.…”
Section: 3 the Influence Of Resistance Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%