2005
DOI: 10.2480/agrmet.653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change of Carbon Dioxide Budget during Three Years after Deforestation in Eastern Siberian Larch Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NLG is a L. cajanderi forest located about 25 km northwest of Yakutsk (Machimura et al 2005(Machimura et al , 2008. The forest is on continuous permafrost, with an active layer depth of approximately 1.0 m. The average and maximum tree heights are 8.6 and 21 m, respectively, and the density is 2100 trees ha −1…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NLG is a L. cajanderi forest located about 25 km northwest of Yakutsk (Machimura et al 2005(Machimura et al , 2008. The forest is on continuous permafrost, with an active layer depth of approximately 1.0 m. The average and maximum tree heights are 8.6 and 21 m, respectively, and the density is 2100 trees ha −1…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larix species also have been planted intensively throughout northern Japan and China, because of their high cold tolerance and timber productivity (Hirata et al 2007). For these reasons, it is important to gain a comprehensive understanding of the carbon and energy exchange characteristics of larch forests (Li et al 2005;Machimura et al 2005;Wang et al 2005b;Hirata et al 2007;Nakai et al 2008;Ohta et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we conclude that the high productivity of understory vegetation was the changed primary component responsible for the low carbon emission induced by the clear-cutting at our site. In fact, the abundant and fast growing understory species always weaken the emission induced by clear-cutting and shorten the term of carbon source after clear-cutting (Kowalski et al, 2003;Machimura et al, 2005;Takagi et al, 2009). Clear-cutting effect on ER appeared less drastic than that on GEP (Clark et al, 2004;Humphreys et al, 2005;Takagi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Clear-cutting Effects On Carbon Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the boreal forests of Canada, the CO 2 emission in the first year after clear-cutting ranged from $200 to $600 g-C m À2 yr À1 (Howard et al, 2004;Humphreys et al, 2005;Machimura et al, 2005;Zha et al, 2009); it took $10 years before it turned back into a net sink of CO 2 (Fredeen et al, 2007;Howard et al, 2004;Kurz and Apps, 1994;Zha et al, 2009). Similarly in Finland, the 4-year-old stand after clear-cutting was still a source of carbon throughout the year (386 g-C m À2 yr À1 ), while the 12-year-old stand was nearly neutral (Kolari et al, 2004).…”
Section: Clear-cutting Effects On Carbon Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation