2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2140740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CH stretch/internal rotor dynamics in ethyl radical: High-resolution spectroscopy in the CH3-stretch manifold

Abstract: High-resolution IR absorption spectra of supersonically cooled ethyl radicals (Trot approximately 20 K) have been obtained in a slit supersonic jet discharge expansion, revealing first rotationally resolved data for CH-stretch excitation of the methyl group. Three different vibrational bands are observed, one parallel (k=0<--0) and two perpendicular (/k/1<--0), which for a nearly decoupled methyl rotor framework would correspond to symmetric and (nearly degenerate) asymmetric CH-stretch excitations. However, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the lowest energy Rydberg states, which interact most strongly with the valence states, often have quantum defects larger than predicted by the Rydberg formula, lowering their energy even further. Most hydrocarbon free radicals have IE 5 9 eV and, because of hyperconjugation [11,[15][16][17][18][19][20], the IEs of many organic closed-shell molecules decrease rapidly with increasing size of the hydrocarbon chain and can be as low as those of radicals. Therefore, the effects described in this review are manifest in the excited state behaviour of a large number of molecules.…”
Section: Rydberg and Valence States Of Open-shell Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the lowest energy Rydberg states, which interact most strongly with the valence states, often have quantum defects larger than predicted by the Rydberg formula, lowering their energy even further. Most hydrocarbon free radicals have IE 5 9 eV and, because of hyperconjugation [11,[15][16][17][18][19][20], the IEs of many organic closed-shell molecules decrease rapidly with increasing size of the hydrocarbon chain and can be as low as those of radicals. Therefore, the effects described in this review are manifest in the excited state behaviour of a large number of molecules.…”
Section: Rydberg and Valence States Of Open-shell Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spectra provide complementary insight into the methyl group orientation and hyper-conjugation-induced effects on the methyl CH stretch absorptions. Extending a model first introduced by Haber and co-workers for the ethyl radical, 32 we show that the pattern of methyl CH stretch transitions and their frequency shifts with electronic excitation reflect a change in the balance of effects due to hyperconjugation and steric interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…83 32 where hyperconjugation acts as a stabilizing force between the partially filled radical site and the methyl group that has implications on the methyl CH stretch modes. For α-MeBz, the methyl CH bond force constants k n oscillate periodically as …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylamine, ethyl radical and protonated methanol (CH 3 XH 2 with X=N, C, O) belong to the G 12 molecular symmetry group [1]. Each of them has two largeamplitude degrees of freedom, the methyl torsion and inversion at X, which together connects six equivalent potential wells [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. CH 3 NH 2 has a high barrier to inversion (~1950 cm -1 ) [3,[9][10][11], whereas in protonated methanol, CH 3 OH 2 + , the barrier is lower (~875 cm -1 ) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH 3 NH 2 has a high barrier to inversion (~1950 cm -1 ) [3,[9][10][11], whereas in protonated methanol, CH 3 OH 2 + , the barrier is lower (~875 cm -1 ) [3]. In the ethyl radical, CH 3 CH 2 , there is no barrier to inversion, only a low-barrier internal rotation path [3,[5][6][7][8]12]. Methylamine, protonated methanol and ethyl radical have torsional barriers of 703.8 cm -1 , 399.6 cm -1 and 8.0 cm -1 , respectively [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%