2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD Simulations and Analyses for Bridge-Scour Development Using a Dynamic-Mesh Updating Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is very difficult to satisfy this requirement, the height of the first grid should be in the logarithmic layer and valid results can still be guaranteed. In the literature, y+ is desirable to be set in a range from 11.6 to 300 in order to achieve an acceptable accuracy in bridge engineering [29,30]. In the current study, the range of y+ is from 30 to 50 in order to ensure that reliable pressure field and velocity field around the near wall regions can be obtained and to avoid the extensive computation.…”
Section: Verification Of the Wave Forces On A Bridge Deckmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While it is very difficult to satisfy this requirement, the height of the first grid should be in the logarithmic layer and valid results can still be guaranteed. In the literature, y+ is desirable to be set in a range from 11.6 to 300 in order to achieve an acceptable accuracy in bridge engineering [29,30]. In the current study, the range of y+ is from 30 to 50 in order to ensure that reliable pressure field and velocity field around the near wall regions can be obtained and to avoid the extensive computation.…”
Section: Verification Of the Wave Forces On A Bridge Deckmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to quantitatively describe the difference between the simulated and measured natural frequencies, a new parameter is proposed in Equation (13). (13) where D 1 = difference between the simulated and measured natural frequencies; f q sim and f q mea = simulated and measured natural frequencies of the qth vibration mode, respectively; and q = concerned orders, which refer to the orders of the scour-insensitive vibration modes. It is noted that other forms of D 1 , i.e., Root-Mean-Squared-Error (RMSE) and the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency, can also be used in Equation 13, which should provide the same iteration results.…”
Section: Identification Of Soil Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analytical solution or numerical simulation is the common way to predict the bridge scour depth due to its practical conveniences [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Along with continuous scour experiments, these formulas for calculation are similar to the real situations [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a more-refine element was meshed around the pile and riverbed for making a better observation of the scour development. In the simulation, the mesh size was set 0.5 cm for the refined places and 1 cm elsewhere [14]. Two mesh planes (x and y directions) were set around the pier to increase the model accuracy and two blocks were built at the inlet and outlet of the channel to prevent upward movement of sediments at the upstream.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%