2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26135-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical vagus nerve morphometry and vascularity in the context of nerve stimulation - A cadaveric study

Abstract: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has become a well-established therapy for epilepsy and depression, and is emerging to treat inflammatory disease, with the cervical vagus nerve (CVN) as major stimulation site. CVN morphometries are missing for VNS, considering its variability. Morphometric data were obtained from CVNs in 27 cadavers, including branching patterns and histology. Cross-sectional area, greater and lesser diameters averaged 7.2 ± 3.1 mm2, 5.1 ± 1.5 and 4.1 ± 1.3 mm, and were ≤11.0 mm2, ≤7.0 and ≤5.8 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
57
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[46] throughout the protocol, by locating the carotid artery as an anatomical reference. Although variation exists regarding the location and topographical anatomy of the cervical vagus nerve, a recent cadaveric study reports that cervical vagus nerve can be visualized in a 35 Â 35 mm distance lateral of the laryngeal eminence and posterior to the skin of the neck, which typically falls under the area the electrodes are placed [107].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46] throughout the protocol, by locating the carotid artery as an anatomical reference. Although variation exists regarding the location and topographical anatomy of the cervical vagus nerve, a recent cadaveric study reports that cervical vagus nerve can be visualized in a 35 Â 35 mm distance lateral of the laryngeal eminence and posterior to the skin of the neck, which typically falls under the area the electrodes are placed [107].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As compared to other animal models, the domestic pig best approximated the diameter of the human vagus (Hammer et al 2018), which is an important point of emphasis for preclinical testing of electrodes and stimulation approaches to minimize off-target effects at human scale. When comparing the surgical window in humans to that of the pig, the presence of the nodose (inferior) ganglion within the surgical window in pig but not in humans has two important implications.…”
Section: Vagotopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are published descriptions of vagal morphology, including from the human cervical VN ( Seki et al, 2014 ; Hammer et al, 2015 , 2018 ; Verlinden et al, 2016 ), human subdiaphragmatic VN ( Tailai et al, 1980 ), rat cervical VN ( Fazan and Lachat, 1997 ; Licursi de Alcântara et al, 2008 ), and rat subdiaphragmatic VN ( Prechtl and Powley, 1985 ). However, each study focused on a single species, typically a single nerve level (e.g., cervical or subdiaphragmatic), and included only a subset of morphological metrics; further, there is a dearth of data on VN morphology in large animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%