2004
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2002.003749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical smears and human papillomavirus typing in sex workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
41
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering genotyping, 50.7% of patients positive for HPV presented at least one genotype of high oncogenic risk. The prevalence of highly oncogenic HPV in the present study was similar to findings in a group of SW from Belgium, where 77.4% tested positively for one or more types of HPV, 55.9% of which for highly oncogenic HPV (10) .…”
Section: Ethical Proceduressupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Considering genotyping, 50.7% of patients positive for HPV presented at least one genotype of high oncogenic risk. The prevalence of highly oncogenic HPV in the present study was similar to findings in a group of SW from Belgium, where 77.4% tested positively for one or more types of HPV, 55.9% of which for highly oncogenic HPV (10) .…”
Section: Ethical Proceduressupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The rate in our study was lower than that of FSWs in Bulgaria (43.4%), Belgium, and Australia (31.6%) [2,6,12]. The lower rate could reflect the smaller proportion of FSWs of younger ages and relatively fewer sexual contacts in our group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Besides, the mentioned rates detected by cervical screening may also vary with the nature of populations screened. For instance, the rates were reported as higher than the control groups at a clinic for sexually transmitted disease and among prostitutes/sex workers (Shlay et al, 1998;Nunez et al, 2002;Mak et al, 2004;International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer, 2007) posing the importance of early detection of cervical cytological abnormalities especially in the populations at high risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%