2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1746-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebrospinal fluid pressure correlated with body mass index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
60
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
18
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Performing a multivariate analysis in the training group with the lumbar CSFP measurements as dependent variable and age, body mass index and blood pressure as independent variables revealed, that CSFP was best described by the formula of CSFP 21.91. The association between higher CSFP and younger age, higher body mass index and higher blood pressure had also been found in other previous investigations [11,12]. We then tested the formula in the testing group.…”
Section: Ethics Statementsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Performing a multivariate analysis in the training group with the lumbar CSFP measurements as dependent variable and age, body mass index and blood pressure as independent variables revealed, that CSFP was best described by the formula of CSFP 21.91. The association between higher CSFP and younger age, higher body mass index and higher blood pressure had also been found in other previous investigations [11,12]. We then tested the formula in the testing group.…”
Section: Ethics Statementsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It confirmed previous investigations that had also reported on associations of higher CSFP with younger age, higher body mass index, and higher blood pressure. 7,8,16 Applying the formula in the independent test group revealed that the measured CSFP (12.6 ± 4.8 mm Hg) did not differ significantly (P = 0.29) from the calculated CSFP (13.3 ± 3.2 mm Hg). A Durbin-Watson value of 2.08 indicated a nonsignificant autocorrelation for the residuals in the multiple regression models (Durbin-Watson values in the range of 1.5-2.5 have usually been considered to be acceptable).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In analogy to the association between retinal vein occlusions and arterial hypertension, the association between an increased retinal vein-to-artery diameter ratio and arterial hypertension may also be explained by the direct effect of blood pressure on the CSFP. 7,8,16 In a similar manner, papilledema occurring as hallmark of stage IV of hypertensive retinopathy may not directly be caused by high arterial blood pressure but indirectly by the concomitantly elevated CSFP. Interestingly, other hypertensive retinal microvascular abnormalities such as arteriovenous crossing signs and arteriolar focal narrowing were not related to CSFP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Die beiden Gruppen unterschieden sich nicht hinsichtlich der Glaukomform, des Alters, des Ausgangsdrucks und der präoperativen Tropftherapie voneinander. Eine Erklärung hierfür könnte der geringere translaminäre Druckgradient zwischen zerebrospinaler Flüssigkeit und Augeninnendruck sein[15,17,18]. Berdahl et al[19] führte eine retrospektive Analyse des Liquordrucks bei mehr als 30 000 Individuen mit und ohne Glaukom durch.…”
unclassified