Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Outcome at a 5- to 10-Year Interval

Meško, Jozef; DʼAntonio, James A.; Capello, William N.; Bierbaum, Benjamin E.; Naughton, Marybeth

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.029

Cited by 44 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Uncomplicated implantation, painfree and active untill a sudden pain occured 10 months after implatation, X-ray showed evident radiological loosening (change in inclination) 16 30…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Early loosening of a press-fit cup with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation: our early results

Haverkamp

Westerbos

Campo

et al. 2013

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Uncomplicated implantation, painfree and active untill a sudden pain occured 10 months after implatation, X-ray showed evident radiological loosening (change in inclination) 16 30…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Early loosening of a press-fit cup with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation: our early results

Haverkamp

Westerbos

Campo

et al. 2013

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, ceramic head size is limited by the required liner thickness to avoid liner fracture. Most studies have reported instances of insertional liner fracture or squeaking, which also have limited CoC's popularity [9,16]. Metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings became very popular because of the large head sizes available and the potential to greatly reduce dislocation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial

Engh

Sritulanondha

Korczak

et al. 2016

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Hard-on-hard bearings for total hip arthroplasty continue to warrant analysis even though crosslinked polyethylene is performing very well. Ceramicon-metal (CoM) has low in vitro wear and did well in an early clinical trial. We report on a prospective, randomized, multicenter investigational device trial comparing CoM with metal-on-metal (MoM). Questions/purposes (1) Is there a difference in the number or type of revisions comparing CoM with MoM? (2) Are cobalt and chromium metal levels different for CoM and MoM THA? Methods Between

show abstract

“…In the MoM group, there were only two reports with Level I to II evidence [86,87] and one report with Level III evidence [18]. In the ceramic-on-ceramic group, there were two reports with Level I evidence [16,53], one report with Level II evidence [50], and two reports with Level III evidence [19,69] (Tables 1 and 2). …”

Section: Search Strategy and Criteriamentioning

confidence: 91%

“…The CoC bearing couple entailed a Biolox Delta head articulating against a Biolox Forte cup (CeramTec GmbH, Plochingen, Germany), whereas the control couples consisted of a zirconia head articulating against a highly crosslinked polyethylene liner (ArCom; Biomet Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA). On the other hand, Mesko et al [53] recorded survival rates at 10 years of 96.8% for the alumina-alumina bearing THA (ABC and Trident; Stryker Orthopaedic, Mahwah, NJ, USA) versus 92.1% for the control CoCrMo-polyethylene, which were significantly different (p = 0.0017). D'Antonio et al [16] found survivorships at 10 years of 97.9% and 95.2% for two alumina-on-alumina THAs (''System I'' and ''System II'') versus 91.3% for the control conventional polyethylene (gamma-sterilized in an inert atmosphere) articulating against a CoCrMo head (''System III'').…”

Section: Alternative Bearings: Metal-on-metalmentioning

confidence: 98%

How Have Alternative Bearings and Modularity Affected Revision Rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Mihalko

Wimmer

Pacione

et al. 2014

Clin Orthop Relat Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to be one of the most successful surgical procedures in the medical field. However, over the last two decades, the use of modularity and alternative bearings in THA has become routine. Given the known problems associated with hardon-hard bearing couples, including taper failures with more modular stem designs, local and systemic effects from metal-on-metal bearings, and fractures with ceramic-onceramic bearings, it is not known whether in aggregate the survivorship of these implants is better or worse than the metal-on-polyethylene bearings that they sought to replace. Questions/purposes Have alternative bearings (metal-onmetal and ceramic-on-ceramic) and implant modularity decreased revision rates of primary THAs?Methods In this systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE, we used several Boolean search strings for each topic and surveyed national registry data from Englishspeaking countries. Clinical research (Level IV or higher) with C 5 years of followup was included; retrieval studies and case reports were excluded. We included registry data at C 7 years followup. A total of 32 studies (and five registry reports) on metal-on-metal, 19 studies (and five registry reports) on ceramic-on-ceramic, and 20 studies (and one registry report) on modular stem designs met inclusion criteria and were evaluated in detail. Insufficient data were available on metal-on-ceramic and ceramic-onmetal implants, and monoblock acetabular designs were evaluated in another recent systematic review so these were not evaluated here.One of the authors (WMM) receives royalty payments, during the study period, an amount of USD 10,000 to USD 100,000 from B Braun/Aesculap Inc (Center Valley, PA, USA) and less than USD 10,000 from Elsevier Inc (Philadelphia, PA, USA); receives USD 10,000 to USD 100,000 as a consultant for B Braun/Aesculap Inc and less than USD 10,000 from Medtronic Inc (Memphis, TN, USA); receives research funding, during the study period, an amount of less than USD 10,000 from B Braun/Aesculap Inc and less than USD 10,000 Stryker Inc (Mahwah, NJ, USA); and serves on the editorial boards for the Journal of Arthroplasty, The Knee, the International Journal of Orthopaedics, and The Journal of Long Term Effects of Medical Implants. One of the authors (MAW) receives institutional funding in the amount of less than USD 10,000 from Biomet, Inc (Warsaw, IN, USA), USD 10,000 to USD 100,000 from CeramTec GmbH (Lauf, Germany), and material support from Zimmer Inc (Warsaw, Inc, USA) and B Braun/Aesculap AG. He is an unpaid consultant for Endolab GmbH and a paid consultant receiving an amount of less than USD 10,000 from Irwing Fritche Urquhart & Moore LLC (New Orleans, LA, USA). One of the authors (MPL) owns Zimmer Holdings, Inc stock but received no payments during the study period. Results There was no evidence in the literature that alternative bearings (either metal-on-metal or ceramic-onceramic) in THA have decreased revision rates. Registry data, however, showed that large he...

show abstract

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Outcome at a 5- to 10-Year Interval

Cited by 44 publications

References 21 publications

Early loosening of a press-fit cup with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation: our early results

Early loosening of a press-fit cup with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation: our early results

No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial

How Have Alternative Bearings and Modularity Affected Revision Rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About