1989
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Cephalometric norms for Orthognathic Surgery in black American adults
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
63
15
12
4
Citation Types
13
47
1
41
Year Published
Range
1991
19912025
2025Publication Types
Select...
70
13
3
Relationship
0
86
Authors
Journals
Cited by 86 publications
(102 citation statements)
References 14 publications
13
47
1
41
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, other studies found excessive protrusion and proclination only of lower incisors. 10,20 Sexual dimorphism was not observed in most of the analyzed variables, except for angular measurements L1.NB and U1.L1, which support the findings of previous studies 9,11,13 that established the high proclination of lower incisors as the main contributor to more acute interincisal angles in females, including in other ethnic groups (Table 3). This difference was statistically significant between genders in the present study and suggests that, among African-Brazilians, women have a greater tendency to present more pronounced bimaxillary protrusion than men.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, other studies found excessive protrusion and proclination only of lower incisors. 10,20 Sexual dimorphism was not observed in most of the analyzed variables, except for angular measurements L1.NB and U1.L1, which support the findings of previous studies 9,11,13 that established the high proclination of lower incisors as the main contributor to more acute interincisal angles in females, including in other ethnic groups (Table 3). This difference was statistically significant between genders in the present study and suggests that, among African-Brazilians, women have a greater tendency to present more pronounced bimaxillary protrusion than men.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The present study confirmed the bimaxillary skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue
protrusion observed in black subjects, which have been described by several
authors 2,4,8,11,15,16,20,22 . This
dentoalveolar protrusion found in blacks is more evident in the mandibular incisors,
compensating the slightly smaller protrusion of the mandible and the smaller chin
prominence in this ethnic group.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The documented interracial/intersex ULVL differences are consistent with reported interracial differences (for females only) 33 and with reported lack of intersex ULVL differences for NHW 29,34 . Regarding TULL, the present results match those of several cephalometric studies that reported 3–5 mm greater UL length in Blacks 11,35–37 . The significant intersex TULL difference being limited only to NHW matches reports of significant intersex differences among Whites 11,35 but not among Blacks 11,36 .…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding TULL, the present results match those of several cephalometric studies that reported 3–5 mm greater UL length in Blacks 11,35–37 . The significant intersex TULL difference being limited only to NHW matches reports of significant intersex differences among Whites 11,35 but not among Blacks 11,36 . Furthermore, NHW TULL results match those calculated from the FNEAWD (see SUL section, Materials and Methods) 29 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, other studies found excessive protrusion and proclination only of lower incisors. 10,20 Sexual dimorphism was not observed in most of the analyzed variables, except for angular measurements L1.NB and U1.L1, which support the findings of previous studies 9,11,13 that established the high proclination of lower incisors as the main contributor to more acute interincisal angles in females, including in other ethnic groups (Table 3). This difference was statistically significant between genders in the present study and suggests that, among African-Brazilians, women have a greater tendency to present more pronounced bimaxillary protrusion than men.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The present study confirmed the bimaxillary skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue
protrusion observed in black subjects, which have been described by several
authors 2,4,8,11,15,16,20,22 . This
dentoalveolar protrusion found in blacks is more evident in the mandibular incisors,
compensating the slightly smaller protrusion of the mandible and the smaller chin
prominence in this ethnic group.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The documented interracial/intersex ULVL differences are consistent with reported interracial differences (for females only) 33 and with reported lack of intersex ULVL differences for NHW 29,34 . Regarding TULL, the present results match those of several cephalometric studies that reported 3–5 mm greater UL length in Blacks 11,35–37 . The significant intersex TULL difference being limited only to NHW matches reports of significant intersex differences among Whites 11,35 but not among Blacks 11,36 .…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding TULL, the present results match those of several cephalometric studies that reported 3–5 mm greater UL length in Blacks 11,35–37 . The significant intersex TULL difference being limited only to NHW matches reports of significant intersex differences among Whites 11,35 but not among Blacks 11,36 . Furthermore, NHW TULL results match those calculated from the FNEAWD (see SUL section, Materials and Methods) 29 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, other studies found excessive protrusion and proclination only of lower incisors. 10,20 Sexual dimorphism was not observed in most of the analyzed variables, except for angular measurements L1.NB and U1.L1, which support the findings of previous studies 9,11,13 that established the high proclination of lower incisors as the main contributor to more acute interincisal angles in females, including in other ethnic groups (Table 3). This difference was statistically significant between genders in the present study and suggests that, among African-Brazilians, women have a greater tendency to present more pronounced bimaxillary protrusion than men.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The present study confirmed the bimaxillary skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue
protrusion observed in black subjects, which have been described by several
authors 2,4,8,11,15,16,20,22 . This
dentoalveolar protrusion found in blacks is more evident in the mandibular incisors,
compensating the slightly smaller protrusion of the mandible and the smaller chin
prominence in this ethnic group.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The documented interracial/intersex ULVL differences are consistent with reported interracial differences (for females only) 33 and with reported lack of intersex ULVL differences for NHW 29,34 . Regarding TULL, the present results match those of several cephalometric studies that reported 3–5 mm greater UL length in Blacks 11,35–37 . The significant intersex TULL difference being limited only to NHW matches reports of significant intersex differences among Whites 11,35 but not among Blacks 11,36 .…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding TULL, the present results match those of several cephalometric studies that reported 3–5 mm greater UL length in Blacks 11,35–37 . The significant intersex TULL difference being limited only to NHW matches reports of significant intersex differences among Whites 11,35 but not among Blacks 11,36 . Furthermore, NHW TULL results match those calculated from the FNEAWD (see SUL section, Materials and Methods) 29 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 87%