2012
DOI: 10.3109/03009734.2012.664178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central venous port-related infection in patients with malignant tumors: An observational study

Abstract: Purpose We evaluated the characteristics of central venous port (CVP)-related infection with microbiological assessments in patients with malignant tumors. Materials and methods In a prospective setting, patients with CVP for the treatment of malignant tumors were enrolled in this study. The incidence of CVP-related infection during three months was determined. Microbiological surveillance from skin swab was performed before and after CVP placement. Resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common infections in this cohort were BSIs. The treatment failure rate was lower for tunnel/pocket infection than for BSI, as was the mortality rate, which was expected because pocket/tunnel infection is a localized infection that usually resolves after the focus (the LTCVC) has been removed (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The most common infections in this cohort were BSIs. The treatment failure rate was lower for tunnel/pocket infection than for BSI, as was the mortality rate, which was expected because pocket/tunnel infection is a localized infection that usually resolves after the focus (the LTCVC) has been removed (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…e desired location for placement of the catheter tips of the implanted TIP and PICC is the same as that of a CICC [3,9,10,16], implying they are reasonable alternatives for measuring CVP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central venous port has grown in importance in cancer centers because of its advantages over central venous catheters, including the reduction of contamination of the device by external or skin pathogens, with an incidence of port‐related infection that varies between 0.9% and 5.4% . Compared with the incidence of CLABSI for tunneled lines (hazard ratio, 1.77; P ≤ .011), nontunneled central venous catheters have a higher incidence of infection (hazard ratio, 3.50; P < .0001), with the exception of peripherally inserted central catheters, in which the incidence rate of infection has been low, between 0.5 and 0.95 per 1000 catheter‐days …”
Section: Preventing Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%