2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-6989(01)00021-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central place practice: shopping centre attractiveness measures, hinterland boundaries and the UK retail hierarchy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that the evaluation of the attractiveness of the shopping centres, as a dynamic element of Central and Eastern European countries, is quite complex and to some extent a subjective task. In this paper, we referred to earlier published scientific studies measuring the attractiveness of the retail environment (especially shopping centres): for example, using agglomeration attributes ; the catchment area (Dolega et al, 2016); central place theory and the retail hierarchy (Dennis et al, 2002b); or, directly according to respondents' consumer preferences (Dennis et al, 1999). Furthermore, we also took into account some of the specific conditions of the Czech-Slovak retail environment and the post-1989 market in the CEE countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude that the evaluation of the attractiveness of the shopping centres, as a dynamic element of Central and Eastern European countries, is quite complex and to some extent a subjective task. In this paper, we referred to earlier published scientific studies measuring the attractiveness of the retail environment (especially shopping centres): for example, using agglomeration attributes ; the catchment area (Dolega et al, 2016); central place theory and the retail hierarchy (Dennis et al, 2002b); or, directly according to respondents' consumer preferences (Dennis et al, 1999). Furthermore, we also took into account some of the specific conditions of the Czech-Slovak retail environment and the post-1989 market in the CEE countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic aim of this theory, designed by Christaller in the 1930s and developed by Lösch in the 1950s, is to establish the principles that determine the number, size and distribution of urban settlements, in accordance with service activities that take place. According to Dennis et al (2002), this theory presents a model in which the shopping visits of the consumers to the nearest mall for a single purpose are determined by the relationship of the retail sales area size, and the distance travelled to reach the mall.…”
Section: Central Place Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static nature of the models limits considerably their development and explanation capacity. Although some recent attempts aim to break this rigidity through the utilisation of qualitative methods (like questionnaire surveys in Dennis et al, 2002) and development of newer concepts (like consumption threshold in Daniels, 2007), central place theories cannot be linked to the urbanisation process as much. Their ignorance of broader social and economic conditions and reduction of social and economic dynamisms into social and economic equilibrium models can be mentioned as the principal factors causing to the failure of the models.…”
Section: Central Place Theory (Cpt)mentioning
confidence: 99%