2016
DOI: 10.1139/cjes-2015-0071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cenozoic uplift of the Central Andes in northern Chile and Bolivia—reconciling paleoaltimetry with the geological evolution

Abstract: Abstract:The Cenozoic geological evolution of the Central Andes, along two transects between ϳ17.5°S and 21°S, is compared with paleo-topography, determined from published paleo-altimetry studies. Surface and rock uplift are quantified using simple 2-D models of crustal shortening and thickening, together with estimates of sedimentation, erosion, and magmatic addition. Prior to ϳ25 Ma, during a phase of amagmatic flat-slab subduction, thick-skinned crustal shortening and thickening (nominal age of initiation ϳ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to ~16–13 Ma, the southern Altiplano and EC were apparently at low elevation, possibly <1 km (Cadena et al, ; Garzione et al, ; Gregory‐Wodzicki et al, ), despite ~65% of the total shortening of the retroarc thrust belt being accomplished by this time (Figure a). This shortening should have resulted in isostatic surface uplift due to crustal thickening (e.g., Hoke et al, ; Lamb, ). However, growth of an eclogitic root beneath the arc and hinterland may have induced a regional isostatic depression of surface elevation that resulted in stalling of the deformation front by promoting increased internal shortening (DeCelles et al, , ; Garzione et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to ~16–13 Ma, the southern Altiplano and EC were apparently at low elevation, possibly <1 km (Cadena et al, ; Garzione et al, ; Gregory‐Wodzicki et al, ), despite ~65% of the total shortening of the retroarc thrust belt being accomplished by this time (Figure a). This shortening should have resulted in isostatic surface uplift due to crustal thickening (e.g., Hoke et al, ; Lamb, ). However, growth of an eclogitic root beneath the arc and hinterland may have induced a regional isostatic depression of surface elevation that resulted in stalling of the deformation front by promoting increased internal shortening (DeCelles et al, , ; Garzione et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delamination has been proposed to account for the composition, timing, and volume of ignimbrite and mafic volcanism (e.g., Kay & Mahlburg Kay, ), the Helium isotope ratios of hydrothermal fluids (Hoke & Lamb, ), and the possible rapid Miocene‐recent uplift of the central Andes (e.g., Garzione et al, , , ). However, the relationship between crustal thickening and uplift rates in the Bolivian Altiplano (Lamb, , ), and inconsistent seismic models that independently infer thick, thin, and variable thickness lithospheric mantle beneath the Andes (e.g., Beck & Zandt, ; Phillips et al, ; Priestley & McKenzie, ; Ward et al, ; Whitman et al, ), calls into question whether delamination beneath the central Andes coeval with extension actually occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neogene evolution of retroarc regions involved continued eastward advance of deformation and foreland basin evolution, with large‐scale shortening accommodated in the frontal thrust belt (Subandean/Santa Bárbara zone) and minor shortening across most of the orogenic interior (Barnes et al, , ; Echavarria et al, ; Ege et al, ; Gubbels et al, ; Kley & Monaldi, ; Lamb, ; Lamb & Hoke, ; Lease et al, ; McQuarrie et al, ; Uba et al, ). Basin evolution was concentrated in foreland regions east of the thrust front, with topographically isolated basins in intermontane settings and the hinterland plateau (Capaldi et al, ; Carrapa et al, ; Coutand et al, ; Horton, , , , ; Horton et al, ; Jordan & Alonso, ; Levina et al, ; Mosolf et al, ; Murray et al, ; Sempere et al, ; Siks & Horton, ; Sobel et al, ; Strecker et al, ; Streit et al, ).…”
Section: Central Andes (23°s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable isotope data and geomorphic surfaces suggest that major surface uplift of the hinterland plateau at 18–22°S was accomplished from middle Miocene to present (Garzione et al, , ; Hoke et al, ; Jordan et al, ), with a possibility of much earlier surface uplift in the Puna plateau at 24–26°S (Canavan et al, ; Quade et al, ). Plateau uplift has been attributed to episodes of lithospheric removal and/or intensified thrust belt shortening (Barnes & Ehlers, ; Garzione et al, ; Gubbels et al, ; Lamb & Hoke, ; Lamb, ).…”
Section: Central Andes (23°s)mentioning
confidence: 99%