Cenário para simulação de Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde: estudo metodológico

Abstract

Aim: to validate the contents of a scenario to be used in the form of a simulation of the management of Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde (RSS - Health Services’ Waste) Method: this is a methodological study that has been developed in three stages: the scenario elaboration, the scenario content validation by experts and testing of the scenario. Results: three experts analyzed the appropriateness of the scenario and suggested adjustments to adapt the elements to the learning objective. The scenario was tested with undergraduate students who also contributed to the refinement of the scenario. Conclusion: a scenario, aimed at stimulating learning in terms of the proper management of RSS, was developed for use in a simulation. Implications for practice: the scenario relating to RSS management can be used in new studies, in teaching and in the training of health professionals in different contexts.

Cenários simulados em enfermagem: revisão integrativa de literatura

“…A maioria dos manuscritos incluídos na amostra da presente pesquisa eram dos últimos cinco anos (9,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) , validados em conteúdo por mais de oito especialistas (9,19,22,(24)(25)(26)(27)31) , com nível de concordância interavaliadores acima de 80% (9,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) . Dois estudos foram submetidos à técnica Delphi (21)(22) , e apenas um artigo era do âmbito internacional (31) .…”

Development, validation and application of clinical simulation scenarios for assessment of stomatherapy specialists

“…There is a lack of validated published scenarios in the literature, which could be replicated or adapted for teaching or evaluation. In recent studies, the validation of scenario content occurred with larger samples of judges (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) . There were 11 judges in this study, five per scenario, corroborating the recommended minimum of five judges for content validation (9) .…”

“…Later, in the validation of the content of the scenarios and checklists, the judges received via Google Forms ® the constructed materials and characterization tool that contemplated the variables: age, gender, training, working time as a nurse, working time in stomatherapy, working time with clinical simulation and experience with scenario building. In the second part of the form, following the content validation reference in the simulation area (19)(20) , each aspect and domain of the scenarios and checklist items were evaluated. It was considered comprehensiveness, clarity, and relevance of psychometry properties and used a 4-point Likert scale, being: 1 -item not very relevant; 2 -item needs considerable revision; 3 -item needs small revision; and 4 -relevant item (9) .…”

Development and validation of clinical cases to be used in maternal-child nursing education

“…The criteria for development of the scenarios should be based on the expected objectives for each simulation (Góes et al, 2014). To check the reliability for application of the developed cases, they need to be validated by experts (Eduardo et al, 2016;Góes et al, 2014).…”

“…At this moment, students communicate and exchange ideas with people who share the same experiences and become more used to dealing with teamwork situations, which are essential in health care delivery (Goés et al, 2014). In this study, scenarios were developed by teachers and students of the undergraduate nursing program, implemented using high-fidelity simulation, and their content was validated by maternal-child health experts who made key suggestions for improving the effectiveness of both scenarios applied in maternal-child nursing education (Eduardo et al, 2016).…”