2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Shape and Substrate Rigidity Both Regulate Cell Stiffness

Abstract: Cells from many different tissues sense the stiffness and spatial patterning of their microenvironment to modulate their shape and cortical stiffness. It is currently unknown how substrate stiffness, cell shape, and cell stiffness modulate or interact with one another. Here, we use microcontact printing and microfabricated arrays of elastomeric posts to independently and simultaneously control cell shape and substrate stiffness. Our experiments show that cell cortical stiffness increases as a function of both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

41
305
3
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
41
305
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the experiments behind this criterion investigated samples which were significantly softer than their underlying substrate and that it cannot be said with certainty that the results reported were not influenced by the relatively low stiffness of the underlying substrate. However, the reported values of cellular stiffness are within the range of previously reported data [17,54 -56], while previous work has confirmed that cells alter their stiffness as a result of changes in the stiffness of their underlying substrate [57,58]. Cell morphology is a widely used indicator of the differentiation stage of osteogenic cells [59,60], and MC3T3-E1 cells have previously been shown to alter their morphology in response to the same changes in the extracellular mechanical environment as induced here [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It should be noted that the experiments behind this criterion investigated samples which were significantly softer than their underlying substrate and that it cannot be said with certainty that the results reported were not influenced by the relatively low stiffness of the underlying substrate. However, the reported values of cellular stiffness are within the range of previously reported data [17,54 -56], while previous work has confirmed that cells alter their stiffness as a result of changes in the stiffness of their underlying substrate [57,58]. Cell morphology is a widely used indicator of the differentiation stage of osteogenic cells [59,60], and MC3T3-E1 cells have previously been shown to alter their morphology in response to the same changes in the extracellular mechanical environment as induced here [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…3C, our findings demonstrated that the elastic modulus of patterned endothelial cells increased with increasing matrix rigidity, in agreement with previous reports on fibroblasts. 24,25 By combining these results, we show that the cell relaxation time decreased with the cell elastic modulus (Fig. 3D), confirming that the cell relaxation dynamics reflects the internal tension of endothelial cells and can be used as a reliable parameter to characterize the pre-stress in adherent cells.…”
Section: Cellular Relaxation Dynamics Is Modulated By Matrix Stiffnesssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…2,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The Atomic Force Microscope 14,15 (AFM) has proved to be a valuable tool for the quantitative characterization of static and frequency-dependent mechanical properties of micro-and nanostructures, including biological specimens, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] thanks to its ability to sense and apply nanoscale forces, and to capture the three-dimensional topography of samples in different environments, including physiological buffers. Several papers report on the measurement by AFM of modulations in cellular elasticity induced by variations in the environmental conditions, like drugs targeting specific cytoskeletal components, [23][24][25] by changes in the elasticity and surface energy of the substrate, [26][27][28] as well as by the correlation between cells' elasticity and their patho-physiological state, including cancer diseases. [29][30][31][32][33][34] In light of these considerations, it is not unreasonable to think about future applications of AFM in bio-nano-medicine, with particular regard to the pre-diagnosis a) alessandro.podesta@mi.infn.it of cancer diseases, drug testing, or regenerative medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%