1987
DOI: 10.1210/edrv-8-1-44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Proliferation of Estrogen-Sensitive Cells: The Case for Negative Control*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But at high 10 μM concentration, AD was not able to suppress adipogenesis and adipocyte numbers were back to the control level, showing a biphasic dose-response. This type of biphasic regulation by a sex steroid (androstenedione) was not unusual, as biphasic regulation of cell proliferation had already been reported for estrogen in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line [24] and for androgen in LNCaP prostate cancer cell line [25] [26]. When adipogenic experiments were repeated in the presence of AR antagonist bicalutamide, there was a decrease in myogenesis and increase in adipogenesis in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that AD action was mediated through AR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…But at high 10 μM concentration, AD was not able to suppress adipogenesis and adipocyte numbers were back to the control level, showing a biphasic dose-response. This type of biphasic regulation by a sex steroid (androstenedione) was not unusual, as biphasic regulation of cell proliferation had already been reported for estrogen in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line [24] and for androgen in LNCaP prostate cancer cell line [25] [26]. When adipogenic experiments were repeated in the presence of AR antagonist bicalutamide, there was a decrease in myogenesis and increase in adipogenesis in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that AD action was mediated through AR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A major unanswered question is whether estrogen action on bone in vivo is direct or indirect (4,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41). It has been suggested that in vivo estrogen promotes the systemic production of growth factors, so-called estromedins, or the removal of growth inhibitors, estrocolyons, elsewhere in the body (42). However, the findings presented here strongly' suggest that estrogen acts directly on bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition to cell proliferation, other markers of estrogenic activity, such as the PgR assay and pS2 assay in MCF-7 cells, are adequate for assessing estrogenicity in humans. Cell proliferation assays are more sensitive than those that induce gene products (1,(29)(30)(31) Figure 3). The analysis of the interaction of E-SCREEN xenoestrogens in the mixtures of three and ididate for four chemicals indicates that the effect of indard of the mixture is 2-to 3-fold higher than the ells at the expected effect, assuming simple additivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%