2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CDM modeling of ductile failure in ferritic steels: Assessment of the geometry transferability of model parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model, which results in a non linear damage accumulation with active plastic strain, requires the knowledge of four damage parameters, all having a physical meaning: the damage threshold strain, " th , at which damage processes initiates; the theoretical failure strain under constant uniaxial state of stress conditions, " f , at which ductile failure would occur; the critical damage, D cr , at which failure occurs; and the damage exponent, ↵, that controls the shape of damage evolution with plastic strain. The parameters can be easily identified with uniaxial tensile tests on smooth and round notched specimen geometries [13,14]. The values for the annealed OFHC 99.98% Cu are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Constitutive Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model, which results in a non linear damage accumulation with active plastic strain, requires the knowledge of four damage parameters, all having a physical meaning: the damage threshold strain, " th , at which damage processes initiates; the theoretical failure strain under constant uniaxial state of stress conditions, " f , at which ductile failure would occur; the critical damage, D cr , at which failure occurs; and the damage exponent, ↵, that controls the shape of damage evolution with plastic strain. The parameters can be easily identified with uniaxial tensile tests on smooth and round notched specimen geometries [13,14]. The values for the annealed OFHC 99.98% Cu are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Constitutive Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…소위 GTN ( (Lemaitre, 1985;Bonora et al, 2006;Choung, 2009b). (Bao and Wierzbicki, 2004;Bao, 2005;Choung et al, 2012;Choung and Nam, 2013;Choung et al, 2014a;Choung et al, 2014b).…”
Section: 서 론mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is derived in the framework of continuum damage mechanics and was verified for different classes of metals and alloys [17]. In this model, damage affects only the elastic stiffness while damage effects flow stress are taken into account in the definition of the material flow curve, leading to a non-softening formulation, which has the advantage to avoid mesh dependency of the solution.…”
Section: Ductile Tearing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model requires only four material parameters to be determined: th  the threshold strain at which damage processes initiates; f  the failure strain under constant uniaxial constant stress triaxiality; cr D , the critical damage at rupture and the shape factor  . These parameters are characteristic of the material and do not depend on the geometry [17]. The damage rate is given by the following expression,…”
Section: Ductile Tearing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%