2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.671457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCD riddle: a) signal vs time: linear; b) signal vs variance: non-linear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the differences of the Poisson distribution are most noticeable at low fluxes and are determined by readout noise and bandwidth of a video channel: Inconsiderable fall of the Fano factor in the greaterflux region appears due to the dispersion decrease which is discussed in recent works (Downing et al, 2006;Ma et al, 2014;Guyonnet et al, 2015) and is probably associated with a charge redistribution between pixels. This effect is one more factor limiting accuracy at high levels of signal in pixel.…”
Section: Distortions Of Ccd Counts' Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, the differences of the Poisson distribution are most noticeable at low fluxes and are determined by readout noise and bandwidth of a video channel: Inconsiderable fall of the Fano factor in the greaterflux region appears due to the dispersion decrease which is discussed in recent works (Downing et al, 2006;Ma et al, 2014;Guyonnet et al, 2015) and is probably associated with a charge redistribution between pixels. This effect is one more factor limiting accuracy at high levels of signal in pixel.…”
Section: Distortions Of Ccd Counts' Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the Poisson-like distribution the photon shot noise variance σ 2 shot should scale linearly with mean signal level. Deviations from this linear relationship can provide an indication of a nonlinear radiometric response (Bohndiek et al, 2008) or a charge-sharing mechanism between pixels (Downing et al, 2006;Stefanov, 2014).…”
Section: Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources can include static 'structural' features that are part of the device design and dynamic sources related to the charge collection process itself. Recent work by a number of researchers 4,5,7,9,10,15,16 has exposed more clearly the effects that both static and dynamic electric fields can have on the effective mapping of photoconversion location to charge collection location.…”
Section: Lateral Electric Fields and Charge Re-distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources can include static 'structural' features that are part of the device design and dynamic sources related to the charge collection process itself. Recent work by a number of researchers 4,5,7,9,10,15,16 has exposed more clearly the effects that both static and dynamic electric fields can have on the effective mapping of photoconversion location to charge collection location.As example of structural design features that can produce charge redistribution, we present the electrostatic effects of the 'scupper' feature that is frequently implemented to guard against charge generated at the periphery of the device from contaminating the signal in the imaging array.A subtler static structural feature is the variation in doping concentrations in the silicon substrate. This variation leads to a deformation of the electric fields that guide the electrons generated by photo-conversion to the collection site in the potential wells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%