2001
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0690(200110)2001:19<3641::aid-ejoc3641>3.0.co;2-6
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Cavities, Layers, and Channels in the Hosting Framework of Molecular Complexes Derived From Cephradine

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
7
3
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
0

Year Published

Range
2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
11
2

Relationship

0
13

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 13 publications

(11 citation statements)
references

References 11 publications

0
10
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The optimized orientations of the acetylamino group as expressed by the dihedral angle C8C7N20C21 for the S1-up conformer 3 correspond to the values of À155.198 3a and 26.248 3b, where the former is more stable by 7.82 kcal/mol. These orientations are in reasonably good agreement with previously reported crystallographic results: À156.798 for bis(cephradine)-2-acetonaphthone clathrate hydrate [30,31], À158.918 for bis(cefadroxil) 2,6-dihydroxynaphthalene clathrate nonahydrate [30], 30.638 for cephradine methyl 3-hydroxybenzoate clathrate [26] and 32.898 for cephradine bis(dimethylformamide) clathrate [26]. Previously reported semiempirical values for cephalotin are À145.48, À128.78, À160.38 and À107.78 at the PM3, AM1, MNDO and MINDO level of calculation, respectively [17].…”
Section: Hf
contrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Basis set 1 2 well as reported crystallographic [18,24,26,27] and semiempirical values [17]. In accordance with X-ray results, some of the predicted values are sensitive to the orientation adopted by the dihydrothiazine ring.…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation