2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1014240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes and Consequences of Disaggregating Earnings Guidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, recent research shows that an increasing number of firms tend to issue management earnings forecasts together with their earnings announcements (e.g., Lansford, Lev, & Tucker, ; Merkley, Bamber, & Christensen, ; Rogers & Van Buskrik, ). As a result, to control for the possibility that management's earnings forecast decisions are affected by the issuance decisions of firms' earnings announcements, we create a separate sample of management earnings forecasts that includes only standalone, nonbundled earnings forecasts (i.e., a sample excluding all management earnings forecasts that were issued together with firms' earnings announcements) in examining the relation between commitment to higher levels of audited financial reporting and firms' management earnings forecast practices.…”
Section: Data Sample and Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, recent research shows that an increasing number of firms tend to issue management earnings forecasts together with their earnings announcements (e.g., Lansford, Lev, & Tucker, ; Merkley, Bamber, & Christensen, ; Rogers & Van Buskrik, ). As a result, to control for the possibility that management's earnings forecast decisions are affected by the issuance decisions of firms' earnings announcements, we create a separate sample of management earnings forecasts that includes only standalone, nonbundled earnings forecasts (i.e., a sample excluding all management earnings forecasts that were issued together with firms' earnings announcements) in examining the relation between commitment to higher levels of audited financial reporting and firms' management earnings forecast practices.…”
Section: Data Sample and Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen, DeFond, and Park (2002) find that after firms start to include balance-sheet data in their earnings announcement press releases, two thirds of the firms continue to do so. Lansford, Lev, and Tucker (2013) report that firms largely continue their practices of either disaggregating MEF or not disaggregating it in the subsequent year. If firms deviate from past practices, the change is a signal to investors.…”
Section: Temporal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For firm-quarters in which a management forecast is issued, we set the measurement date as the earlier of either the day immediately preceding the issuance of the first management forecast for the quarter or the day before the previous quarter's earnings announcement. Measurement date is used to exclude the effect of previously issued management forecasts on the properties of analysts' forecasts and to mitigate problems related to the possible omission of management forecasts made during conference calls from First Call (Lansford et al 2010). For firm-quarters in which a management forecast is not issued, the measurement date is randomly assigned based on the distribution of the measurement dates used for the firm-quarters with management forecasts.…”
Section: Data and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%