2009
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorization of sodium sieving by 2.27% and 3.86% peritoneal equilibration tests--a comparative analysis in the clinical setting

Abstract: The standard 2.27% PET permits some categorization of sodium sieving in PD patients. However, the information provided by this test lacks the discriminatory capacity of the 3.86% PET, which should be considered the one for reference for this purpose. GFR keeps a consistent inverse correlation with the intensity of sodium sieving in both the 2.27% and 3.86% PET.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between drainage and instillation volumes was recorded as ultrafiltration (correcting for sample volume removed during PET, bag over-fill with fresh PDF, and empty bag weight). The 3.86% PET allows calculation of peritoneal transport rates with accuracy comparable to the 2.27% PET, while providing more information on peritoneal membrane function such as sodium sieving [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between drainage and instillation volumes was recorded as ultrafiltration (correcting for sample volume removed during PET, bag over-fill with fresh PDF, and empty bag weight). The 3.86% PET allows calculation of peritoneal transport rates with accuracy comparable to the 2.27% PET, while providing more information on peritoneal membrane function such as sodium sieving [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, the PD cycler can be set up for one 24-hour treatment and 60-240 -minute exchanges used as clinically indicated. With excessively short APD dwell times and hypertonic dialysate, there is a greater risk of sodium sieving particularly with hypertonic solutions leading to excessive free water loss (in the absence of sodium removal) and biochemistry should be reviewed for rises in serum sodium 5,34 . With frequent automated PD cycling: hypokalemia may also ensue necessitating intraperitoneal and/or intravenous potassium supplementation.…”
Section: Acute Pd Protocol and Prescription Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a PET test, water initially moves faster into the peritoneal cavity due to the large osmotic gradient, created by the fresh hypertonic glucose dialysate, whereas convective sodium movement into the peritoneal cavity moves slower through so called “small pores” . This leads to a relative fall in the ratio of dialysate sodium to serum sodium, which is termed sodium sieving, and is a measure of the hydraulic permeability .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of sodium sieving has been linked to loss of aquaporin channels . Sodium sieving is greatest during the first 90 min of the PET test .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%