Data Science With R for Psychologists and Healthcare Professionals 2021
DOI: 10.1201/9781003106845-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical Data Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, studies were eligible if they were written in English and published in a peer-review journal. In terms of study design, and in line with Cochrane guidelines (see Ryan, 2013), it was decided at the full-text stage to include randomised control trials (RCTs) and controlled beforeand-after studies (CBA). This was because both study designs involve an appropriate level of standardisation for the effects of intervention and control groups to be compared across studies.…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, studies were eligible if they were written in English and published in a peer-review journal. In terms of study design, and in line with Cochrane guidelines (see Ryan, 2013), it was decided at the full-text stage to include randomised control trials (RCTs) and controlled beforeand-after studies (CBA). This was because both study designs involve an appropriate level of standardisation for the effects of intervention and control groups to be compared across studies.…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthesis of the results is performed according to the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group guidelines [ 44 ]. The risk of bias (RoB) and the quality/certainty [ 45 ] of the body of evidence are assessed independently by two members of the review committee according to PRISMA 2020 statement [ 46 ] using: the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool RoB2 for randomized clinical trials [ 47 ]; the ROBINS-I tool [ 48 ] for studies not randomized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests do not show causality but only dependence or independence. For a fuller description of the technique, see Williams (2021), “Categorical Data Analysis” in the references. We also employed dependent sample t-tests to test for consensus equivalence of decision outcomes across semesters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%