2022
DOI: 10.1111/pce.14327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catastrophic hydraulic failure and tipping points in plants

Abstract: Water inside plants forms a continuous chain from water in soils to the water evaporating from leaf surfaces. Failures in this chain result in reduced transpiration and photosynthesis and are caused by soil drying and/or cavitation-induced xylem embolism. Xylem embolism and plant hydraulic failure share several analogies to 'catastrophe theory' in dynamical systems. These catastrophes are often represented in the physiological and ecological literature as tipping points when control variables exogenous (e.g., … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(309 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Processes include reduced hydraulic conductance and increased vulnerability to embolism, reduced carbon assimilation, and shifting C allocation away from resin and defense molecule production, which may compromise tree vulnerability to subsequent biotic and abiotic perturbations (McDowell, 2011; Raffa et al, 2008; Rissanen et al, 2020). At the forest scale, the processes that underlie loss of resilience likely destabilize the system and increase the likelihood that future perturbations may lead forests to transition to an alternate stable state (Hammond, 2020; Johnson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes include reduced hydraulic conductance and increased vulnerability to embolism, reduced carbon assimilation, and shifting C allocation away from resin and defense molecule production, which may compromise tree vulnerability to subsequent biotic and abiotic perturbations (McDowell, 2011; Raffa et al, 2008; Rissanen et al, 2020). At the forest scale, the processes that underlie loss of resilience likely destabilize the system and increase the likelihood that future perturbations may lead forests to transition to an alternate stable state (Hammond, 2020; Johnson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n is a scaling exponent that depends on whether the plant is shade tolerant (the preferred crop type for AV) or not (see Figure 1), B o is a reference biomass for which L = L o is known and is usually set by the early seedling stage (set here at t = 0). With this representation, the VBE reduces to an autonomous first-order dynamical system given by (Johnson et al, 2022)…”
Section: The Plant Carbon Balance: a Dynamical Systems Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary one is to naively assume an allometric relation between B ( t ) and L ( t ) given by (Mrad et al., 2020; Niklas, 1994; Perry, 1984; Richards, 1959) LLo=BBon, $\frac{L}{{L}_{o}}={\left(\frac{B}{{B}_{o}}\right)}^{n},$ where n is a scaling exponent that depends on whether the plant is shade tolerant (the preferred crop type for AV) or not (see Figure 1), B o is a reference biomass for which L = L o is known and is usually set by the early seedling stage (set here at t = 0). With this representation, the VBE reduces to an autonomous first‐order dynamical system given by (Johnson et al., 2022) dBdt=Ffalse(Bfalse)=AcPgLoBBonkmB=kmB[]αBBon11,0.3333emnbspnewlineα=()LokmAcPgBo. $\frac{dB}{dt}=F(B)={A}_{c}{P}_{g}{L}_{o}{\left(\frac{B}{{B}_{o}}\right)}^{n}-{k}_{m}B={k}_{m}B\left[\alpha {\left(\frac{B}{{B}_{o}}\right)}^{n-1}-1\right],\hspace*{.5em}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}\alpha =\left(\frac{{L}_{o}}{{k}_{m}}\frac{{A}_{c}{P}_{g}}{{B}_{o}}\right).$ Von Bartalenffy labeled the first term describing F ( B ) as anabolism (biosynthesis potential) to allow for an n that differs from the commonly assumed 2/3 value (initially proposed by Galileo). The VBE also allows for supra‐exponential growth ( n > 1), which is at times observed in some systems such as cities (Bettencourt et al., 2007).…”
Section: The Plant Carbon Balance: a Dynamical Systems Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effects of water de cit have been well documented (Li et al 2020;Misra et al 2020;Patmi et al 2020); they mainly affect cell elongation and division, inhibiting plant growth at different stages. This growth reduction is partly due to a decrease in stomatal conductance to prevent cavitation and hydraulic failure, leading to a sharp drop in transpiration and CO 2 assimilation (Johnson et al 2022). Water restriction can also affect the contents of photosynthetic pigments, soluble and storage carbohydrates, proteins, and amino acids (Patmi et al 2020), and negatively impact other photosynthetic traits, such as the quantum yield (F v /F 0 ) and the maximum quantum e ciency of photosystem II photochemistry (Tripathi et al 2015;Li et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%