2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catastrophic cat predation: A call for predator profiling in wildlife protection programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our suggestion of specific (rogue) cats being disproportionately responsible for the deaths of many reintroduced hare‐wallabies is consistent with Moseby et al . () who, based on a literature review and experimental analysis of the fate of reintroduced Western Quoll ( Dasyurus geoffroyii ), concluded that mature male cats exceeding 3.5 kg were more likely to kill larger, more challenging prey and potentially have the greatest impact on translocation success. They and others (see Read et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our suggestion of specific (rogue) cats being disproportionately responsible for the deaths of many reintroduced hare‐wallabies is consistent with Moseby et al . () who, based on a literature review and experimental analysis of the fate of reintroduced Western Quoll ( Dasyurus geoffroyii ), concluded that mature male cats exceeding 3.5 kg were more likely to kill larger, more challenging prey and potentially have the greatest impact on translocation success. They and others (see Read et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, previous single predator incursions have been recorded in fenced reserves and have not resulted in mass predation events, suggesting that many prey species can tolerate the low densities of predators required for these trials (see examples in Moseby et al. ).…”
Section: Kick‐starting Learning and Natural Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional consideration is the complexity of relationships between predator and prey abundance. A reduction in cat numbers may not directly translate into reductions in predation rates, nor increases in prey populations (Spencer, Van Dyke, & Thompson, , ), especially if control does not remove “problem” individuals that have a disproportionate impact on prey populations (Moseby, Peacock, & Read, ; but see Swan, Redpath, Bearhop, & McDonald, ). Finally, in order for cat control to directly benefit threatened species, it also needs to be concentrated on high‐priority areas that contain—or could contain—populations of threatened species that are negatively affected by cats (Dickman, Denny, & Buckmaster, ).…”
Section: Is the Target Being Met?mentioning
confidence: 99%