2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-3373(02)00159-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic reduction of SO2 over supported transition-metal oxide catalysts with C2H4 as a reducing agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the concentration of NO (500 ppm) is much lower compared to SO 2 (2000 ppm). Furthermore the difference could be also due to characteristic nature and the reaction mechanism of pure PSAC, PSAC sorbents and the reactivity of the metal oxides themselves [20,21]. This concludes that pure PSAC without the help of metal catalyst could only adsorb SO 2 gas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the concentration of NO (500 ppm) is much lower compared to SO 2 (2000 ppm). Furthermore the difference could be also due to characteristic nature and the reaction mechanism of pure PSAC, PSAC sorbents and the reactivity of the metal oxides themselves [20,21]. This concludes that pure PSAC without the help of metal catalyst could only adsorb SO 2 gas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result also suggested that the metal oxides on the RHA/CaO sorbents act as active sites for the SO 2 and/or NO sorption. It has been reported that transition metal oxides support Ca-based sorbents by playing a catalytic role in providing active sites for the sorption of SO 2 and NO gases [14,15,[31][32][33][34]. Besides, SO 2 and NO might also compete for the same active sites on the RHA/CaO sorbents [11,33,35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, high reaction temperature and long gas−solid reaction time can bring about high energy consumption. 10 Moreover, the C−SO 2 reaction is difficult to control owing to a large difference in properties between various carbon materials, complex side reactions, and inevitable generation of toxic byproducts such as CO, COS, CS 2 , and H 2 S. 5,11 Gaseous reductants, such as CO, 12 H 2 , 1313 and hydrocarbons, 14,15 can also reduce SO 2 to elemental sulfur. As these gaseous reducing agents lead to extreme reaction conditions during SO 2 reduction, the reduction reactions need to rely on catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%