2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-018-0923-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalysis of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction by 4–10 nm Cobalt Nanoparticles

Abstract: Electrolysis of water is key technology, not only for clean energy production, but to ensure a continued supply of hydrogen beyond fossil resources, essential to the manufacture of many chemical goods other than fuels. Cobalt nanomaterials have been widely identified as a promising candidate for the anode (oxygen evolution) reaction in this process, but much work has focused on applied materials or electrode design. Given the importance of oxidation state changes Co(III) → Co(IV) in the accepted reaction mecha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density of active sites is often simply approximated by the exposed geometric surface area (measured by, e.g., microscopy or N 2 adsorption [16] ) or the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) by assumptions regarding intrinsic capacitance. [15,[17][18][19] However, all of these normalization approaches imply that electrochemical activity is governed exclusively by the terminal surface layer of the oxide, without serious consideration of sub-surface layers that may influence activity as well.Size effects in the OER activity of nanoparticles, [20,21] thickness-dependent effects in thin films, [22] and substrate-dependent effects in 2D materials [23] imply that while a catalytic reaction occurs at the catalyst/electrolyte interface, the supporting layers of a catalyst (and/or its support) can influence activity as well. For oxides, these size effects can include manipulating the ability of transition metal sites to oxidize prior to the onset of OER.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of active sites is often simply approximated by the exposed geometric surface area (measured by, e.g., microscopy or N 2 adsorption [16] ) or the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) by assumptions regarding intrinsic capacitance. [15,[17][18][19] However, all of these normalization approaches imply that electrochemical activity is governed exclusively by the terminal surface layer of the oxide, without serious consideration of sub-surface layers that may influence activity as well.Size effects in the OER activity of nanoparticles, [20,21] thickness-dependent effects in thin films, [22] and substrate-dependent effects in 2D materials [23] imply that while a catalytic reaction occurs at the catalyst/electrolyte interface, the supporting layers of a catalyst (and/or its support) can influence activity as well. For oxides, these size effects can include manipulating the ability of transition metal sites to oxidize prior to the onset of OER.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed activation energies for the reduction of Co 3 O 4 -like clusters or nanoparticles to CoO and the following reduction of CoO to Co are shown in Table 2 for some catalysts supported on H-ZSM- The yields of oxygen obtained in the presence of catalysts 1%Со(6)-Z(s) are shown in Table 3 (samples Nos. [1][2][3][4]. Under identical conditions, the maximal yield of oxygen (64 % of the stoichiometry of reaction (IV)) was observed with the catalyst supported on ZSM-5 zeolite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five series of Co-ZSM-5 catalysts were prepared by this method. In the first series, the NH 4 OH/Co 2+ () ratio was varied (3,6,10,15,20,30) by varying the ammonia concentration at the constant cobalt content (1 wt %). H-ZSM-5 zeolite with Si/Al=17, 95 % crystallinity and no more than 0.09 wt % of Fe impurity was used for the preparation.…”
Section: Catalyst Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated TOF values are comparable to previous results reported in literature. [52][53][54] For example, Cao et al 54 stated TOF values between 0.05 and 4.0 s −1 at 1.6 V vs. RHE for CoO x /PCN and RuO x catalysts. The presented method to determine the TOF based on a geometric approach has a great potential for the evaluation of electrocatalysts and aims for the elucidation of structure-activity relationships.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%