Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop 2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w17-1308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAT: Credibility Analysis of Arabic Content on Twitter

Abstract: Data generated on Twitter has become a rich source for various data mining tasks. Those data analysis tasks that are dependent on the tweet semantics, such as sentiment analysis, emotion mining, and rumor detection among others, suffer considerably if the tweet is not credible, not real, or spam. In this paper, we perform an extensive analysis on credibility of Arabic content on Twitter. We also build a classification model (CAT) to automatically predict the credibility of a given Arabic tweet. Of particular o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study [6] stated that fake news published on Twitter during the last American presidential elections in 2016, had a significant effect on voters. Several studies have shown that much of the content on Twitter is not credible [7][8][9]. Research by ElBallouli et al [8] found that approximately 40% of the tweets posted per day are not credible tweets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A recent study [6] stated that fake news published on Twitter during the last American presidential elections in 2016, had a significant effect on voters. Several studies have shown that much of the content on Twitter is not credible [7][8][9]. Research by ElBallouli et al [8] found that approximately 40% of the tweets posted per day are not credible tweets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that much of the content on Twitter is not credible [7][8][9]. Research by ElBallouli et al [8] found that approximately 40% of the tweets posted per day are not credible tweets. Moreover, Gupta et al [9] International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, Vol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations