1985
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04210090069019
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Case Against Microvascular Decompression in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
27
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
4
0
0

Year Published

Range
1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
19
9

Relationship

0
28

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 28 publications

(4 citation statements)
references

References 3 publications

0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…57 Several have questioned the use of a procedure with nonzero mortality for a benign disease and propose the use of the percutaneous procedures for most surgical management of TN. [58][59][60] Currently, the most common indication for partial sensory rhizotomy is as an alternative to microvascular decompression when a convincing neurovascular impingement is not found, as noted in up to 14 to 21% of cases. 35,61,62 Compared with microvascular decompression, partial sensory rhizotomy has fewer good results, and generally major recurrences are more common.…”
Section: Surgical Therapy Of Trigeminal Neuralgia
mentioning
confidence: 99%