Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cars, calls, and cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the domain of driving, multiple studies have looked at how drivers interleave nondriving, secondary tasks with driving. A common strategy is to wait for 'natural breakpoints' in the task to switch attention [11,12,26,27,28,48]; for example, Iqbal et al showed that drivers chunked a task of providing directions while driving into multiple steps and reoriented to driving at the boundaries between chunks [26]. There are many advantages of interleaving at natural breakpoints: it reduces mental workload [3,49] as it reduces information that needs to be maintained in memory [7], it frees mental resources such as visual attention for other tasks [50,55], it reduces stress [4], it reduces the time needed for later task resumption (cf.…”
Section: Managing Multitasking During Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the domain of driving, multiple studies have looked at how drivers interleave nondriving, secondary tasks with driving. A common strategy is to wait for 'natural breakpoints' in the task to switch attention [11,12,26,27,28,48]; for example, Iqbal et al showed that drivers chunked a task of providing directions while driving into multiple steps and reoriented to driving at the boundaries between chunks [26]. There are many advantages of interleaving at natural breakpoints: it reduces mental workload [3,49] as it reduces information that needs to be maintained in memory [7], it frees mental resources such as visual attention for other tasks [50,55], it reduces stress [4], it reduces the time needed for later task resumption (cf.…”
Section: Managing Multitasking During Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversations during driving can be generally distracting but vary based on the content of the conversation (Iqbal et al, 2010). The primary reason for distraction is that talking requires cognitive resources.…”
Section: How Conversations Distract Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary reason for distraction is that talking requires cognitive resources. In particular, the more “thinking” is required for talking, the stronger the interference on other tasks such as visual attention tasks (Kunar et al, 2008; Strayer & Johnston, 2001) and driving (Iqbal et al, 2010). The distraction is likely attributable to a central processing bottleneck (Kunar et al, 2008), not the act of generating sound, as even mentally (and not verbally) reciting a list can interfere with driving performance (Salvucci & Beltowska, 2008).…”
Section: How Conversations Distract Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, these experiments are not repeated to ensure maximum dependability of the driver on the DAS (Chan et al, 2010). While driving, questions based on the earlier reading material will be posed to the driver that will later produce a situation where the driver is talking to passengers in the vehicle while driving based on the direction and guidance (simulating cognitive load) from DAS (Iqbal et al, 2010). Total number of subjects: 25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%