2014
DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2014.43835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CARDIAC SURGERY The effects of posterior pericardiotomy on pericardial effusion, tamponade, and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery

Abstract: IntroductionPericardial effusion and atrial fibrillation occur commonly after coronary artery surgery.Aim of the studyA prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of posterior pericardiotomy on the occurrence of pericardial effusion, tamponade, and atrial fibrillation.Material and methodsThe study group consisted of 96 patients (77 male and 19 female) at a mean age of 58.1 ± 9.8 years. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three study groups: patients undergoing posteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies reported that postoperative pericardial effusion can provoke the development of atrial fibrillation which is the most prevalent arrhythmia in the postoperative period [13,14]. In our study we releaved that new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly more common in control group (14.5%) than in the PW group (4.5%, P<.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Recent studies reported that postoperative pericardial effusion can provoke the development of atrial fibrillation which is the most prevalent arrhythmia in the postoperative period [13,14]. In our study we releaved that new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly more common in control group (14.5%) than in the PW group (4.5%, P<.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A number of surgeons do routinely place a posterior pericardial tube (usually soft flexible rubber tube) in addition to an anterior mediastinal tube in the same time avoiding potential risk of PP-related complications. Yet, no consensus exists on the required duration of such drainage 27,30 and its efficacy in preventing particularly delayed cardiac tamponade. In a subgroup analysis stratified by operative technique, we demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences between the technical approaches to posterior pericardial drainage in regard to the risk of primary endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those, 18 were further excluded because they were not pertinent to the design of the meta-analysis or did not meet the explicit inclusion criteria. Nineteen RCTs 11,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] that enrolled 3425 patients eventually were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with a posterior pericardial drainage (n ¼ 1723) and control group without (n ¼ 1702).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations