2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carburization behavior of AISI 316LN austenitic stainless steel – Experimental studies and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30] Hence, in Indian sodium containing 25 ppm carbon, of which 2 ppm is in solution, carbon activity would be much higher than in type 316LN austenitic stainless steel containing 0.03 wt pct carbon. [31] A comparison of Figures 5(b) and (c) suggested that the carbon diffusing into type 316LN stainless steel caused extensive precipitation of M 23 C 6 carbides. Hence, carbon that diffused into the steel formed a carburized zone with a high volume fraction of M 23 C 6 type of carbides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[30] Hence, in Indian sodium containing 25 ppm carbon, of which 2 ppm is in solution, carbon activity would be much higher than in type 316LN austenitic stainless steel containing 0.03 wt pct carbon. [31] A comparison of Figures 5(b) and (c) suggested that the carbon diffusing into type 316LN stainless steel caused extensive precipitation of M 23 C 6 carbides. Hence, carbon that diffused into the steel formed a carburized zone with a high volume fraction of M 23 C 6 type of carbides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It was possible to expect that a modified surface layer exists on the samples due to contact with sodium coolant. For example, as shown in [4], for 16000 hours irradiation at 793K the thickness of carburized zone was found to be ~60 microns. In order to avoid any contamination caused effects, samples were polished mechanically, and layers of ~200 microns thickness were removed from both sides.…”
Section: Alloys Composition and Structurementioning
confidence: 92%
“…When surface carbon concentration is constant then Eq. (1) has an analytical solution given by error function [19,21,22]:…”
Section: Key Models Of Carbon Diffusion In the Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such case the carbon surface concentration is determined by carbon activity in the gas [8]. For stationary processing, the Dirichlet type boundary condition can be applied which provides the surface carbon concentration (c C s ) equal to the carbon potential (C p ) in the carburizing atmosphere (c C s = C p ) [21,22].…”
Section: Boundary Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%