2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
51
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study of air versus CO 2 insufflation for resection of large colonic lesions showed a significant reduction in the rate of postprocedure admissions due to abdominal pain with CO 2 insufflation, but no significant difference in the rates of perforation [25]. The study by Bassan et al suggested that CO 2 is rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream resulting in less bowel distention, less bowel wall tension at the mucosal resection site and hence less pain.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide Insufflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of air versus CO 2 insufflation for resection of large colonic lesions showed a significant reduction in the rate of postprocedure admissions due to abdominal pain with CO 2 insufflation, but no significant difference in the rates of perforation [25]. The study by Bassan et al suggested that CO 2 is rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream resulting in less bowel distention, less bowel wall tension at the mucosal resection site and hence less pain.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide Insufflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 As such, luminal distention with CO 2 insufflation is less prolonged than with air and has been associated with less patient discomfort after longer endoscopic procedures including colonoscopy 28 and fewer postprocedure admissions in a series of patients undergoing resection of large colonic lesions. 29 The safety of CO 2 insufflation during prolonged ESD procedures under moderate and deep sedation is well-established. 30 Further, the rapid reabsorption of CO 2 may theoretically reduce the likelihood of tension pneumoperitoneum developing in the event of a perforation.…”
Section: Electrosurgical Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36][37] The rate of local recurrence generally approximates 1%, whereas 5-year overall survival ranges from 96% to 100% and 5-year disease-specific survival ranges from 99% to 100%. 29,[31][32][33] Both immediate technical outcomes (eg, R0 resection) and the local recurrence rate are superior for lesions meeting Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria 38 (differentiated mucosal cancer, !2 cm, without ulceration) than the expanded National Cancer Center criteria, 39 but there have been no differences in mortality. 33,[35][36][37][38][39] Two meta-analyses evaluated ESD versus EMR for the treatment of early gastric cancer.…”
Section: Efficacy and Comparison With Available Technologies Stomachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most EMR resections can be performed under conscious sedation, although procedures that are anticipated to take a long time (ESD, very large PEMR) or resections close to the dentate line might be more comfortably per formed with propofol deep sedation or general anaesthe sia. Carbon dioxide insufflation is now considered as the standard of care, reducing postprocedure distention and pain 33,34 . Supplemental oxygen and an intravenous saline infusion help to maintain cardiovascular stability during the procedure and might help protect against vaso vagal reactions.…”
Section: Preparation For Emr or Esdmentioning
confidence: 99%