“…Also, the value of ΔEp [ΔEp = Epa − Epc] was evaluated to be 0.250 V and 0.273 V for the MIP/ITO and NIP/ITO electrodes, respectively. 58 Further, an increase in the peak potential with an increment in the scan rate shows a sluggish electron transfer at the interface.ΔEp (MIP/ITO) = 0.020 V s −1 mV −1 × (scan rate [mV s −1 ] 1/2 ) + 0.101 V, R 2 = 0.995Similarly, linear fit curves of the NIP/ITO electrode showing the Ipa, Ipc, and ΔEp [Fig. S1(c)†] relationship as a function of the square root of the scan rate are given by eqn (5)–(7), respectively.Ipa (NIP/ITO) = 31.843 μA s −1 mV −1 × (scan rate [mV s −1 ] 1/2 ) + 118.359 μA, R 2 = 0.987Ipc (NIP/ITO) = −25.072 μA s −1 mV −1 × (scan rate [mV s −1 ] 1/2 ) + 71.380 μA, R 2 = 0.989ΔEp (NIP/ITO) = 0.023 V s −1 mV −1 × (scan rate [mV s −1 ] 1/2 ) + 0.102 V, R 2 = 0.997The analysis and electron movements were studied using kinetic interface parameters, for instance, the electron transfer rate constant (Ks), diffusion constant ( D ), surface area (Ae), and surface concentration of the redox probe of the electrode ( I *) for both MIP/ITO and NIP/ITO electrodes.…”