2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon capture efficiency, yield, nutrient uptake and trafficability of different grass species on a cultivated peat soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples from all treatments were subjected to the same staining procedure, and the roots were thoroughly rinsed to remove the stain after digitization. The average root N concentration across treatments (15.7 g kg −1 DM), for which the effect of soaking solutions was nonsignificant ( p > .05), was very close to previously reported values for unstained timothy roots at first cut (13.5 g N kg −1 DM in growth chambers [Bertrand et al., 2014] and 15.7 g N kg −1 DM in a field experiment [Berglund et al., 2018]). A previous study also reported that fine root N concentration was unaffected by root preparation methods (roots rinsed in tap water, deionized water, or prepared dry, immediately after sampling) (Rytter & Rytter, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples from all treatments were subjected to the same staining procedure, and the roots were thoroughly rinsed to remove the stain after digitization. The average root N concentration across treatments (15.7 g kg −1 DM), for which the effect of soaking solutions was nonsignificant ( p > .05), was very close to previously reported values for unstained timothy roots at first cut (13.5 g N kg −1 DM in growth chambers [Bertrand et al., 2014] and 15.7 g N kg −1 DM in a field experiment [Berglund et al., 2018]). A previous study also reported that fine root N concentration was unaffected by root preparation methods (roots rinsed in tap water, deionized water, or prepared dry, immediately after sampling) (Rytter & Rytter, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Samples from all treatments were subjected to the same staining procedure, and the roots were abundantly rinsed to remove the stain after digitization. The average root N concentration across treatments (15.7 g kg -1 DM), for which the effect of soaking solutions was non-significant (p > .05), was very close to previously reported values for unstained timothy roots at first cut [13.5 g N kg -1 DM in growth chambers (Bertrand et al, 2014) and 15.7 g N kg -1 DM in a field experiment (Berglund et al, 2018)].…”
Section: Is a Mathematical Correction For Adhering Soil Relevant?supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Those tendencies are in line with the general understanding of N 2 O emergence in soils, where soil moisture is a major driver of N 2 O emissions [33,94]. Concerning the order of magnitude of the N2O emission fluxes from the non-inundated shore of the littoral zone, their overall level is not higher than on nutrient-rich temperate extracted fens after inundation [41] or from a cultivated fen peat [95]. All fluxes from the open water were below detection limit.…”
Section: N 2 O Fluxessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Further, the transition from extracted peatland to wetland ecosystem may reduce the overall climate warming impact due to C sequestration (peat). Graminoids such as Calamagrostis canescens, Poa trivialis, and Concerning the order of magnitude of the N 2 O emission fluxes from the non-inundated shore of the littoral zone, their overall level is not higher than on nutrient-rich temperate extracted fens after inundation [41] or from a cultivated fen peat [95]. All fluxes from the open water were below detection limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our research revealed that the lower the dose of sewage sludge, the lower the uptake of macronutrients with the yield of reed canary grass and giant miscanthus biomass. The lower amount of macronutrients uptaken results from the amount of yield and the 'dilution effect' of these nutrients in the plant biomass, which finds confirmation in other studies (Antonkiewicz et al 2018, Berglund et al 2019, Biel et al 2017. The study by Berglund et al (2019) also confirms that reed canary grass utilizes macronutrients well and, compared to other species of grasses, it takes up more of them with the yield compared to the amounts introduced with fertilizers.…”
Section: Macronutrient Uptakesupporting
confidence: 60%