2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon assimilation, water consumption and water use efficiency under different land use types in subtropical ecosystems: from native forests to pine plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that both sites were in the status of water-balance because the actual expenditure of all study sites was less than the actual input water at the annual scale (Figure 10 and Table 4). This result was consistent with the subtropical forests (Cristiano et al, 2020;Song et al, 2017).…”
Section: Effects Of Pruning and Land-use Conversion On Water Balancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results showed that both sites were in the status of water-balance because the actual expenditure of all study sites was less than the actual input water at the annual scale (Figure 10 and Table 4). This result was consistent with the subtropical forests (Cristiano et al, 2020;Song et al, 2017).…”
Section: Effects Of Pruning and Land-use Conversion On Water Balancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, because crops in different growing seasons had different response degrees (slopes) to meteorological elements, WUE exhibited as non-linear relationships with meteorological elements similar to such as winter wheat-summer maize rotation cropland on the annual scale (Chen, Zhang, et al 2021). In contrast, the relationship between WUE and meteorological elements was linear in forests (Cristiano et al 2020), grassland and meadow (Zhu et al 2017). This difference indicated that the planting system of rotation cropland was an important reason for this non-linear effect.…”
Section: Impact Of Asymmetrical Variations Of Gpp and Et On Wuementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Variability in water use efficiency (WUE) reflected the tradeoff between water loss and carbon gain during photosynthetic carbon assimilation (Yu et al 2008). A series of studies on WUE were carried out around the world, most of which focused on forests and grasslands (Zhu et al 2017;Nie et al 2021;Cristiano et al 2020). Although several studies reported disparities in WUE under different time scales, crop types, climate and water regimes, the mechanism of WUE change in crops is still uncertain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schwärzel et al [7] also showed that understory, as opposed to overstory, may be an unexpected key major water consumer regulator. In situ water balance studies have shown differences among vegetation types, and a major common finding indicates that water use is a function of leaf area as a key driver, triggered by atmospheric demand [62,88,89]. This suggests that effects on ecosystem water resources are mainly physical, and forest plantations may not differ from a broad range of natural forests that sustain similar leaf area levels under the same conditions of atmospheric demand.…”
Section: Implications For Water Use Carbon Allocation and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%