Capitalist Accumulation, Contradictions and Crisis in China, 1995–2015

Abstract

Drawing upon Marxian and regulation theory, this article seeks to identify key dynamics and contradictions of capitalist accumulation in China between 1995 and 2015 and to explain these in their institutional context. To this end, data from national accounts and input-output tables is re-mapped to estimate Marxian categories such as the rates of surplus value and profit. The article demonstrates how the transformation of the wage relation and an increase in the rate of surplus value lie at the core of a predominantly extensive accumulation regime that enabled rapid and uncoordinated growth facilitated by world market integration. In the wake of the global crisis, however, a confluence of contradictions has led to over-accumulation and a decline in profitability, clear symptoms of exhaustion of the accumulation regime that explain the current slowdown under the "New Normal." The underlying contradictions are rooted in the institutional context of the "Socialist Market Economy," but especially in the wage relation, which no longer supports sufficient increases in the rate of surplus value or a regular pace of accumulation.

Global Capitalism and the Underdevelopment of African Political Economy: Where Will Our Help Come From?

“…To maximise and sustain mercantilism (trade and commerce) from the fifteenth century, Europe erupted into industrial revolution, engaged in colonialism— dominated overseas territories where they exploited raw materials cheaply and sold their locally made products at very exorbitant prices through which they imposed rulership on the aborigines for holistic exploitation of human and material resources. The cause of this, according to Lenin (1917), is traced to European crisis of profiteering inherent in internal dynamics and contradictions occasioned by capitalism due to its fundamental principle of struggles for accumulation upon accumulation that never ends, thereby engendering excessive greed, leading to unhealthy competition, which Pauls (2021) and Bello (2006) remarked is enveloped with contradictions and crises. This also, according to Onuoha (2008) leads to economic war of all against all in the struggle for survival, dominance and relevance since the superstructure indirectly determines and controls the base.…”

La Sociología Histórica Internacional y el estudio de la China moderna: un enfoque metodológico

“…Estos autores suelen argumentar que la clave para entender la China moderna reside en su naturaleza estadista y en el hecho de que una gran parte de los medios de producción están en manos del gobierno. Si bien es cierto que académicos marxistas como Radhika Desai (2013) ofrecen una visión holística de la formación del Estado chino a través de la teoría del desarrollo desigual y combinado de León Trotsky, la gran mayoría de autores que operan en estas corrientes de pensamiento suelen ofrecer una visión acrítica de los efectos negativos del desarrollismo chino, situándolos dentro de las "contradicciones" (Pauls, 2021) internas del "Socialismo con características chinas" establecido por Deng Xiaoping en la década de los setenta. Este tipo de argumento que sitúa los males de la economía china dentro del marco nacional del Estado contribuye a que no se debata en profundidad la naturaleza del Estado chino ni su compleja economía política que está insertada en la economía global capitalista y que está expuesta a sus dinámicas negativas.…”

A Study on The Hidden Exploitation of Labor Process: The Case of Chinese Female Take-Away Riders

“…The Marxist theory of surplus value holds that the capitalist, in the process of capitalist production, makes the labor force enter the labor process by purchasing the particular commodity of labor and eventually produces the value of the commodity (Pauls, 2022). The difference between the commodity value formed by the laborer's physical and mental effort and the value of the labor force is called surplus value.…”