Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: A missing link in the transmission mechanism?

Abstract

a b s t r a c tFew areas of monetary economics have been studied as extensively as the transmission mechanism. The literature on this topic has evolved substantially over the years, following the waxing and waning of conceptual frameworks and the changing characteristics of the financial system. In this paper, taking as a starting point a brief overview of the extant work on the interaction between capital regulation, the business cycle and the transmission mechanism, we offer some broader reflections on the characteristics of the transmission mechanism in light of the evolution of the financial system. We argue that insufficient attention has so far been paid to the link between monetary policy and the perception and pricing of risk by economic agents-what might be termed the "risk-taking channel" of monetary policy. We develop the concept, compare it with current views of the transmission mechanism, explore its mutually reinforcing link with "liquidity" and analyse its interaction with monetary policy reaction functions. We argue that changes in the financial system and prudential regulation may have increased the importance of the risktaking channel and that prevailing macroeconomic paradigms and associated models are not well suited to capturing it, thereby also reducing their effectiveness as guides to monetary policy.

It ain’t over till it’s over: A global perspective on the Great Moderation-Great Recession interconnection

“…Moreover, both innovations in the global monetary policy stance (MP) and risk factor disturbances (RF) deepened the U.S. trade imbalance since the early 2000s, while portfolio allocation shifts (PA) and terms of trade shocks (TT) had a partially offsetting effect. The worsening of Td determined by monetary policy shocks accords with the basic mechanism of the international risk-taking channel of monetary policy (Borio and Zhu 2012;Bruno and Shin 2015): over-expansionary U.S. monetary policy caused a contraction in perceived risk and funding costs, fuelling asset prices and the net worth of financial institutions, as well as their leverage and risk-taking attitude, resulting in capital inflows into the U.S. and depreciation of the US$.…”

An Asset-Based Framework of Credit Creation (applied to the Global Financial Crisis)

“…They found that the "confidence risk channel" is able to explain large negative price moves in the absence of fundamental changes in macroeconomic variables. The importance of "risk perception" and its feedback on asset values is also present in Borio and Zhu (2012), who find that "the mutually reinforcing feedback between perceptions of value and risk, on the one hand, and financing constraints and "liquidity", on the other, has arguably become more prominent. Under some circumstances, it may therefore also contribute to amplifying business fluctuations more than in the past" (p. 248).…”

Macro-Financial Effects of Portfolio Flows: Malaysia's Experience

“…As described in Calvo (1998) and Forbes and Warnock (2012), an exogenous sudden slowdown in capital flows can cause large unexpected changes in relative prices such as depreciation of the domestic currency and collapse of asset prices. These developments can trigger a further reversal of capital flows, leading to sharp corrections in collateral values and a credit crunch (Borio & Zhu, 2012;Meissner, 2013).…”