1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00776241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity theory without duality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) It is shown in [30] that if v is an entrance law at r, then Qu(a ^ r) = 0, whence the nomenclature.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(b) It is shown in [30] that if v is an entrance law at r, then Qu(a ^ r) = 0, whence the nomenclature.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D Let A be as for Corollary (7.15). Then Qm(TA = -oo) < Qm(TA = a) = 0 so that A is ra-cotransient in the terminology of [30]. The measure pa is the cocapacitary measure of A, and its mass pa(1) is the cocapacity of A, denoted C(A).…”
Section: Jdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, a natural extension of Hunt's balayage LBm was defined in section 5 of [4]. (See also Getoor and Steffens [8,9] and Kaspi [13] for further work on this topic. ) Recall that if the potential kernel U -Psds is proper then any excessive measure m can be realized as the increasing limit of a sequence of potentials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%