1987
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Capacity analysis of a manufacturing cell
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
30
3
0
0
Citation Types
0
15
0
0
Year Published
Range
1990
19902023
2023Publication Types
Select...
29
3
1
Relationship
0
33
Authors
Journals
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
References 14 publications
0
15
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This is incorporated in the model of Graves (1986) which opens the discussion on clearing functions. Models from Srinivasan et al (1988), Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1989a, Asmundsson et al (2002Asmundsson et al ( , 2003, and Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) follow in this regard. Moreover, the model of Missbauer (1998) emphasizes lot sizing decisions and integrates them into a clearing function model.…”
Section: Models Incorporating Load Dependent Lead Times
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For more detail see Karmarkar et al (1985b) or Karmarkar (1987). This function is clearly similar to the clearing function, although derived in a different context.…”
Section: Clearing Function Model Of Karmarkar
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, as pointed out by Asmundsson et al (2002), the schedules are dependent on the release schedule and consequently on the planning algorithm. Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b. They develop a clearing function which captures the dependency of the expected throughput of a single-stage production system closely related to the classical Wagner-Whitin model (see Wagner and Whitin 1958) including setups, expected WIP levels and lot sizes which is then integrated into a dynamic lot sizing model.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Asmundsson et al (2003) and Karmarkar (1987) we see that one of the fundamental problems of various manufacturing and production planning models like mrp or manufacturing resources planning (MRP II) is the omission of modeling nonlinear dependencies. These include, e.g., the relationship between lead times and the workload of a production system or a production resource.…”
Section: Common Planning Concepts
mentioning
confidence: 98%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This is incorporated in the model of Graves (1986) which opens the discussion on clearing functions. Models from Srinivasan et al (1988), Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1989a, Asmundsson et al (2002Asmundsson et al ( , 2003, and Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) follow in this regard. Moreover, the model of Missbauer (1998) emphasizes lot sizing decisions and integrates them into a clearing function model.…”
Section: Models Incorporating Load Dependent Lead Times
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For more detail see Karmarkar et al (1985b) or Karmarkar (1987). This function is clearly similar to the clearing function, although derived in a different context.…”
Section: Clearing Function Model Of Karmarkar
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, as pointed out by Asmundsson et al (2002), the schedules are dependent on the release schedule and consequently on the planning algorithm. Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b. They develop a clearing function which captures the dependency of the expected throughput of a single-stage production system closely related to the classical Wagner-Whitin model (see Wagner and Whitin 1958) including setups, expected WIP levels and lot sizes which is then integrated into a dynamic lot sizing model.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Asmundsson et al (2003) and Karmarkar (1987) we see that one of the fundamental problems of various manufacturing and production planning models like mrp or manufacturing resources planning (MRP II) is the omission of modeling nonlinear dependencies. These include, e.g., the relationship between lead times and the workload of a production system or a production resource.…”
Section: Common Planning Concepts
mentioning
confidence: 98%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This is incorporated in the model of Graves (1986) which opens the discussion on clearing functions. Models from Srinivasan et al (1988), Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1989a, Asmundsson et al (2002Asmundsson et al ( , 2003, and Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) follow in this regard. Moreover, the model of Missbauer (1998) emphasizes lot sizing decisions and integrates them into a clearing function model.…”
Section: Models Incorporating Load Dependent Lead Times
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For more detail see Karmarkar et al (1985b) or Karmarkar (1987). This function is clearly similar to the clearing function, although derived in a different context.…”
Section: Clearing Function Model Of Karmarkar
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, as pointed out by Asmundsson et al (2002), the schedules are dependent on the release schedule and consequently on the planning algorithm. Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b. They develop a clearing function which captures the dependency of the expected throughput of a single-stage production system closely related to the classical Wagner-Whitin model (see Wagner and Whitin 1958) including setups, expected WIP levels and lot sizes which is then integrated into a dynamic lot sizing model.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Asmundsson et al (2003) and Karmarkar (1987) we see that one of the fundamental problems of various manufacturing and production planning models like mrp or manufacturing resources planning (MRP II) is the omission of modeling nonlinear dependencies. These include, e.g., the relationship between lead times and the workload of a production system or a production resource.…”
Section: Common Planning Concepts
mentioning
confidence: 98%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This is incorporated in the model of Graves (1986) which opens the discussion on clearing functions. Models from Srinivasan et al (1988), Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1989a, Asmundsson et al (2002Asmundsson et al ( , 2003, and Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) follow in this regard. Moreover, the model of Missbauer (1998) emphasizes lot sizing decisions and integrates them into a clearing function model.…”
Section: Models Incorporating Load Dependent Lead Times
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For more detail see Karmarkar et al (1985b) or Karmarkar (1987). This function is clearly similar to the clearing function, although derived in a different context.…”
Section: Clearing Function Model Of Karmarkar
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, as pointed out by Asmundsson et al (2002), the schedules are dependent on the release schedule and consequently on the planning algorithm. Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hwang and Uzsoy (2004) combine the work of Karmarkar (1987) and Asmundsson et al (2002) and add lot sizing in order to show how small or large lot sizes influence the resulting production plans. For that purpose they present a single-product dynamic lot sizing model which takes into account WIP and congestion using queuing models such as those presented by Karmarkar (1987Karmarkar ( , 1993b. They develop a clearing function which captures the dependency of the expected throughput of a single-stage production system closely related to the classical Wagner-Whitin model (see Wagner and Whitin 1958) including setups, expected WIP levels and lot sizes which is then integrated into a dynamic lot sizing model.…”
Section: Fig 3 Partitioned Clearing Function For Products a And B
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Asmundsson et al (2003) and Karmarkar (1987) we see that one of the fundamental problems of various manufacturing and production planning models like mrp or manufacturing resources planning (MRP II) is the omission of modeling nonlinear dependencies. These include, e.g., the relationship between lead times and the workload of a production system or a production resource.…”
Section: Common Planning Concepts
mentioning
confidence: 98%