2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capabilities of digital servitization: Evidence from the socio-technical systems theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2022a) utilised STS theory's concepts to categorise the barriers for digitalisation in hospitals and verify how they impact on operational performance. Münch et al . (2022) adopted an STS perspective to investigate the interrelationship and complementarity of internal and external components important for digital servitisation.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2022a) utilised STS theory's concepts to categorise the barriers for digitalisation in hospitals and verify how they impact on operational performance. Münch et al . (2022) adopted an STS perspective to investigate the interrelationship and complementarity of internal and external components important for digital servitisation.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neglect of technological intensity has proven as a literature gap in the theory of digital servitization (Munch et al, 2022). Therefore, an in-depth understanding of relations between digital servitization and technology intensity is needed to respond to the servitization paradox challenge (Munch et al, 2022). Furthermore, this research fills the gap in the literature with the explanation which combination of servitization and digital servitization make the highest financial performance according to the technology level of the firm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, the adoption of digital solutions in manufacturing firms should be in line with the technology intensity of the firm (Avadikyan et al, 2012, Rakic et al, 2021a. The neglect of technological intensity has proven as a literature gap in the theory of digital servitization (Munch et al, 2022). Therefore, an in-depth understanding of relations between digital servitization and technology intensity is needed to respond to the servitization paradox challenge (Munch et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through digital servitization, manufacturing firms adopt digital technologies and consequently adjust their value creation, value delivery, and value capturing [28,29]. Hence, the adoption of digital technologies requires manufacturing firms to reflect the accompanying dynamics in their organizations, e.g., to enable novel ways of how to collaborate or to facilitate novel roles to manage digital technologies [28,30]. Even though digital technologies and associated expert roles are critical in digital servitization, few contributions have been made about organizing digital and traditional IT resources, particularly for manufacturing firms [22,23,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%