2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabis-related diagnosis in pregnancy and adverse maternal and infant outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maternal alcohol‐related diagnoses during pregnancy and maternal comorbidities (preexisting diabetes, non‐alcohol substance‐related diagnoses during pregnancy, and mental health diagnoses complicating pregnancy) were identified from ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes in a hospital discharge, emergency department, or ambulatory surgery records during pregnancy or delivery as has been utilized in previous studies (Table S1 ). 18 , 19 , 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maternal alcohol‐related diagnoses during pregnancy and maternal comorbidities (preexisting diabetes, non‐alcohol substance‐related diagnoses during pregnancy, and mental health diagnoses complicating pregnancy) were identified from ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes in a hospital discharge, emergency department, or ambulatory surgery records during pregnancy or delivery as has been utilized in previous studies (Table S1 ). 18 , 19 , 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we calculated the e‐value, or the strength of an unmeasured confounder necessary to negate the observed multivariable exposure‐outcome association, as has been previously reported. 18 E‐values were computed for “any cardiac defect,” “endocardial cushion defect,” and “abnormalities of the cardiac outflow tract” in fully adjusted models both with and without nicotine adjustment (R package episensr ). The e‐value is the minimum strength of the association, on the risk ratio scale, that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the treatment and outcome, conditional on the measured covariates, to fully explain away the observed exposure‐outcome association.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and ICD-10 (n=1)] as a measure of abuse, addiction, or mental or behavioral disorder associated with cannabis use during pregnancy 26,[46][47][48] , childbirth [46][47][48][49][50] or in the period from the twelve months before pregnancy to delivery 51 .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 The prevalence of cannabis use during pregnancy ranged from 0.005 26 to 39%. 31 Six studies 24,29,35,46,49,50 evaluated the trend of use. Five identified an increase in the prevalence of cannabis use during pregnancy, 24,35,46,49,50 while Straub et al 29 did not identify any difference in prevalence rates in the pre-and postlegalization periods of recreational use of cannabis.…”
Section: Cannabis Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation