2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid Modulation of Opiate Reinforcement through the Ventral Striatopallidal Pathway

Abstract: Recent evidence indicates that cannabinoid-1 (CB 1 ) receptors play a role in the mediation of opiate reward, though the neural mechanisms for this process have not been characterized. The present experiments investigated the influence of CB 1 receptors in the ventral striatopallidal system on opiate-induced neurochemical events and opiate self-administration behavior in rats. Acute morphine administration (3 mg/kg) significantly reduced ventral pallidal GABA efflux in a manner similar to that produced by hero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
105
3
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
9
105
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Anatomical overlap suggests the possibility that both endocannabinoid and opioid signals might act on the same local circuits to amplify hedonic impact. It is of interest that CB1 receptors and opioid receptors are reported to interact, can occur in the same striatal synapses, and even be colocalized on the same neurons in nucleus accumbens shell and core (Tanda et al, 1997;Hohmann and Herkenham, 2000;Rodriguez et al, 2001;Pickel et al, 2004;Caille and Parsons, 2006). If colocalization occurs in hotspot neurons, this would support the possibility that endocannabinoid and opioid neurochemical signals in nucleus accumbens might interact to enhance 'liking' reactions to the sensory pleasure of sucrose.…”
Section: Hottest Spot In Dorsal Medial Shellmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anatomical overlap suggests the possibility that both endocannabinoid and opioid signals might act on the same local circuits to amplify hedonic impact. It is of interest that CB1 receptors and opioid receptors are reported to interact, can occur in the same striatal synapses, and even be colocalized on the same neurons in nucleus accumbens shell and core (Tanda et al, 1997;Hohmann and Herkenham, 2000;Rodriguez et al, 2001;Pickel et al, 2004;Caille and Parsons, 2006). If colocalization occurs in hotspot neurons, this would support the possibility that endocannabinoid and opioid neurochemical signals in nucleus accumbens might interact to enhance 'liking' reactions to the sensory pleasure of sucrose.…”
Section: Hottest Spot In Dorsal Medial Shellmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, a 1 mm 3 'hedonic hotspot' was recently found in the medial shell where m opioid receptor activation by DAMGO microinjections tripled positive 'liking' orofacial reactions that are elicited by sucrose taste in rats (Peciña and Berridge, 2005), and stimulated food intake (though the intake 'wanting' site extended further) (Bakshi and Kelley, 1993;Zhang and Kelley, 2000;Peciña and Berridge, 2005). Opioid and endocannabinoid neurotransmissions are known to positively interact (Tanda et al, 1997;Kirkham and Williams, 2001;Navarro et al, 2001;Rowland et al, 2001;Williams and Kirkham, 2002b;Verty et al, 2003;Solinas and Goldberg, 2005;Vigano et al, 2005;Caille and Parsons, 2006;Cota et al, 2006), raising the possibility that endocannabinoid receptor activation might increase 'liking' for natural rewards in the same hedonic hotspot of the medial accumbens shell where opioids do so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraperitoneal and site-specific doses of rimonabant were chosen based on previous literature (Caille and Parsons, 2006;Dore et al, 2013b;Gessa et al, 2006;Roche et al, 2007).…”
Section: Drugmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, WIN55,212-2 (1 or 5 g in 0.5 l of vehicle) or vehicle (0.5 l) was continuously delivered for 3 min. In some cases, infusion of rimonabant [1 g (Caillé and Parsons, 2006) in 0.25 l of vehicle for 1.5 min] was performed 1 min before infusion of WIN55,212-2 (1 g in 0.25 l of vehicle for 1.5 min). In all groups, total infusion volume was 0.5 l. The microinfusion connector assembly was left in place 4 more min to allow the drug solution to diffuse into the target structure (mPFCv).…”
Section: Experiments 5: Intracerebral Mpfcv Microinfusion and Fstmentioning
confidence: 99%